The Leaflet Profile picture
Aug 28, 2019 33 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Day 14


A five-judge bench comprising CJI Ranjan Gogoi and Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan & Abdul Nazeer has assembled.

PN Mishra continuing his arguments.
PN Mishra is clarifying the issue regarding contradictory directions being shown in Map handed by Mr. Mishra as compared to others.
PNM: First time anyone saw inscription on the wall was first in 1946 when the magistrate went and it has been accepted that inscriptions were placed again in 1934. So these inscriptions are placed in 1934.
Mr. P N Mishra reading out observations of High Court with regard to missing pages of Tuzk-i-Babari or Babarnama. He submits that only pages regarding 3 days in 935 Hijri (1528 AD) is missing and the inscriptions indicate that foundation of mosque was laid in 935 Hijri.
PN Mishra is also laying stress that in Babarnama there is no person referred to as Mir Baqi, while other people by name of Baqi are mentioned, noone by name of Mir Baqi is mentioned.
J. Bobde: What is your case? is there a positive case or just that Babar did not demolish the temple and constructed a mosque.

PNM: My case is positive. They amended their case to delivery of possesion.
CJI: Did you not challenge the order allowing amendment.

J. Bobde: We are also going to consider this that what happens when the subject matter of a suit is destroyed, we want to know that whether the amended prayer clauses (added after demolition in 1992) can be granted.
J. Bobde: Mr. Mishra what is your theory?
PNM: They filed a suit seeking that our temple is mosque. Their case is based on that Babar built it. For waqf by user it has to be shown that since a long time it was used as mosque, they need not show who was waqif, but they have taken a specific stand that Babar was waqif, so
i am disputing their case.

J. Bobde: First listen to the question, we understand that you want to dispute their case that Babar built a mosque but the fact is that the disputed structure has some trappings of a mosque and some features of a temple. What is your theory.
PNM: I will show the account of Niccolo Mannuci who was commander of Aurangzeb.

J. Bobde: Aurangzeb had an Italian commander?

PNM: Yes.

Bobde: We want to hear your positive case as to how this structure came into existence. If you have any theory.
PNM: It was by Aurangzeb, Manucci records that Aurangzeb destroyed 4 famous hindu structures.

J. Bobde: How will you prove it was Aurangzeb. Would you like to list these reasons with evidence that it was Aurangzeb?

PNM: My lords my duty as defendant is to dispute their case.
PNM: In Ain i Akbari, Abul Fazal has mentioned to Ramkot as being birthplace of mosque.

J. DYC: Does Ain I Akbari mention any mosques?

PNM: No, it mentions only 3 graves bit no mosque. This Ain-i-Akbari was written by Abul Fazal upon the insistence of Babar's grandson Akbar
PNM: second Document is Humayun Nama written by Gulbadan Begum, daughter of Babar, which also does not mention any mosque.

PNM: Third document is Tuzuk-i-Jahangiri and it also does not mention any mosque.
PN Mishra was reading the account of Niccolo Manucci, when Dr. Dhawan interjects: My lords, let me point it out for my Ld. friend to answer is that this account of Mannuci was not exhibited before the High Court, it was relied upon in oral submissions.
PN Mishra points that there was a specific order passed by the High Court to the effect that these historical documents referred by him were admitted under Section 57 of Evidence Act.
Bench rises for the lunch.

Post lunch session. Bench has assembled. Hearing resumed.

Mishra continuing to read his submissions as recorded by the High Court regarding non mention of Babari Masjid in Ain I Akbari

J. DYC: Are any mosques mentioned at any places in Ain I Akbari?

PNM: In other places, but not in Ayodhya.

J. Bobde: Which places, show.

PNM: My lords have asked question that i did not expect, i will tell tomorrow.

PN Mishra starts referring to book titled Mughal India.

J. DYC: Is this book available on evidence volumes.

PNM: This book was allowed by High Court order, i told earlier, duri g arguments.
Dr. Dhawan: My lords this book was published in 2010 and several pages were published, it was not placed.

PNM: The book was published later but at that time i had referred to some pages.

Dr. Dhawan: This takes us back to Section 57.

CJI: You will have to show us that order
Having concluded his arguments on the issue as to whether Babar had built the mosque or not, PN Mishra continues his submissions on Islamic Law and its application to the present Suits.
PNM: why have they said in their plaint that there was a battle between emperor of Ayodhya and Babar.
PNM: As per Islamic law, this place was Darul Islam and in Darul Islam when a reigning Muslim ruler is defeated by another Muslim king, land is not taken, only revenue is allowed. Ibrahim Lodi was ruling Oudh so it was Darul Islam.
PNM: Second is Darul Haq where a non muslim ruler is there, then the lands are taken.

J. DYC: So Mr. Mishra you are saying that this territory was ruled by a Muslim ruler and so that situation will apply, what is the consequence?

PNM: I will impeach the findings of HC that Babar has been said to be absolute sovereign and he could do what he did.
J. Bobde: Mr. Mishra, there was no change in regime, a muslim ruler continued from another, how does it make the mosque invalid.

PNM: Because my lords for making a mosque the waqif should have been the owner of the land, Babar by conquering does not become owner.
CJI: We understand your point we will deal with it tomorrow. What is your argument on Islamic law, deal with it briefly.
PNM: My lords in Islamic Law there is no concept of Limitation. Since rule of Babar till annexation of Oudh in 1856 there was Islamic Law so there could not have been a question of Limitation.

CJI: What is the revenue record you wanted to show where you said there was large scape forgery? where is that? Show us so that we will read it today.

PNM: It is in the judgment, (refers to a page)

CJI: Where is the translation and show it in exhibit.
PNM: I will show it tomorrow.

CJI: No we want to see it today. Do one thing, take 10 minutes, find out and give details to courtmaster.

Bench rises for the day. Hearing to continue tomorrow.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with The Leaflet

The Leaflet Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheLeaflet_in

Apr 5, 2023
National security claims cannot be made out of thin air. There must be material backing such an inference, says SC while quashing a ban on MediaOne TV channel. ImageImage
The critical views of the Channel, Media-One on policies of the government cannot be termed, ‘anti-establishment’. The use of such a terminology in itself, represents an expectation that the press must support the establishment: Supreme Court. Image
SC: The action of the MIB by denying a security clearance to a media channel on the basis of the views which the channel is constitutionally entitled to hold produces a chilling effect on free speech, and in particular on press freedom.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 2, 2023
Breaking: Supreme Court directs that the appointment of an election commissioner shall be on the recommendation of a committee comprising the PM, Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, and the CJI.
The committee will function till the time Parliament enacts a law in this regard.
Same shall also be applicable for the appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner.
Read 6 tweets
Apr 2, 2022
Justice A S Oka will be delivering the key note speech in a short while on Vision of Independent India: Ranade, Tilak and Gokhale. Do tune in.
Justice Oka: In the second half of the 19th century, Maharashtra gave the nation a galaxy of social reformers, philosophers, activists, and freedom fighters.
Justice Oka: It is always a great learning experience to study the thoughts of Mahatma Jyotiba Phule, Narayan Meghaji Lokhande, Lokhitwadi Gopal Hari Deshmukh, Gopal Ganesh Agarkar, Justice Mahadev Govind Ranade, Gopal Krishna Gokhale and Bal Gangadhar Tilak, to name a few.
Read 63 tweets
Apr 1, 2022
With the passage of time, like every other institution of repute, the CBI has also come under deep public scrutiny. Its actions and inactions have raised questions regarding its credibility, in some cases: CJI N V Ramana
Every institution within our democracy must derive its legitimacy either directly from the Constitution, or from a law that is made in the true spirit of the
Constitution: CJI
CJI: Unfortunately, our investigative agencies still do not have the benefit of being guided by a comprehensive law. Need of the hour is the creation of an independent and autonomous investigative agency.
Read 7 tweets
Nov 26, 2021
The freedoms guaranteed by Article 19 are not liable to be freely expressed only if they fall in line with a majoritarian view, says Delhi HC while rejecting a plea seeking ban on @salman7khurshid’s book ‘Sunrise Over Ayodhya’.
HC: A democracy governed by the rule of law would be placed in serious peril if creative voices were stifled or intellectual freedom suppressed or suffocated.
HC: The freedom to freely express ideas and opinions cannot be permitted to be overshadowed by the ominous cloud of being non-conformist.
Read 6 tweets
Nov 26, 2021
The event goes live!

Do follow this thread for updates.

Sr. Adv Darius Khambata: Ours is a magnificent Constitution. It encapsulates respect for fundamental rights, institutions, separation of powers and so many other things. It is a document that can and must unify us.
Khambata: The Constitution gives us a template within which we can learn to respect each other. The 'Idea of India' is reposed in our Constitution, summarised in our Preamble.

Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!