Lots of skepticism about TIF, especially from Chicago, where TIF districts eat up 1/3 of city revenue: illinoispolicy.org/report-tifs-fa… 3/12
TIFs go wrong in at least 3, maybe 4 ways, although city says they've avoided some of these. Let's see: 4/12
(1) Speculative TIFs set up TIF districts and just hope to attract private development, but it never arrives. Not a problem in #RVA, says city - we've already lined up $900M in development (hotel, apartments, etc.), and city won't borrow for arena until contracts are signed 5/12
(2) Zombie TIFs set up in "blighted" districts to spur development. But stay in place long after nabe is gentrified and doesn't need city $$, becoming slush fund for developers and city. Not in #RVA, says city - TIF only pays back arena loan 6/12
(Although I should note that that it’s unclear to me from the TIF ordinances how the TIF fund would be dissolved; this is something city should clarify) 7/12
(3) Failed TIFs do not generate enough revenue to pay for improvements. This is bigger problem for #RVA; city says there will be plenty of money, but other folks are concerned; we def need more evidence on projections 8/12 nocoliseum.com/category/other…
(THO City is right that a default on the arena loan shouldn’t have any effect on the city’s bond rating or ability to borrow elsewhere, at least according to Brookings study) brookings.edu/blog/up-front/… 9/12
(4) Toughest call: TIFs may have "opportunity costs" in diverting $$ that could be used for something else. Because TIF district is so big (all of downtown), uses some $$ that would be there anyway and could go to schools, roads, etc. 10/12
Plus some development could happen anyway. If convention hotel is such a no-brainer, why does it need arena? Wouldn't developers want to build apartments anyway? Won't #VCU expand no matter what? 11/12
Bottom line: TIF isn't biggest concern, instead revenue projections and development pipeline. New #RVACouncil commission members should make these underlying assumptions a priority in their review. 12/End
As I prep my political theory class for this fall, I'm struck that one thing the TX abortion law should hammer home, and that some of us sometimes forget: conservatism is openly hostile towards individual freedom #Thread
1/
As ideology, conservatism embraces ancient ideas of difference. Plato's Republic imagines world where people are sorted according to innate characteristics; Aristotle thought democracy was worst form of government. To Greeks, some people just better suited to rule than others
2/
In 1790, Brit Edmund Burke essentially launched conservatism by criticizing the French revolution. Liberty is fine, Burke argued, but what if it's the liberty of a "madman" or "murderer"? Freedom needs constraints, and isn't for everyone
3/
As #VAGOP convention approaches, candidates talking about banning "critical race theory" from our schools. We know that racist appeals work on many white voters (hi Donald!) but this one is especially insidious. Here's why #Thread
1/
First, #CriticalRaceTheory is term for some pretty high-level scholarship and theoretical work, like real pomo philosophy shit. Crenshaw, Delgado, Bell. Mostly influential in legal theory. Time mag explainer (h/t to @bluevirginia) is just fine: 2/ time.com/5891138/critic…
Key here: CRT is WAY less influential than critics claim, even in theory circles. Often mocked by traditional establishment voices. Just check this '98 Cornell law review article that claims to take CRT seriously, but actually drips w mockery/disdain 3/ scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewconten…
Background: the federal govt's Home Owners' Loan Corporation was a New Deal org aimed at helping people keep their homes post-Depression. Financially, it did pretty well - even turning a small profit 2/ trumanlibrary.gov/library/public…
But to "help" mortgage lenders, they generated maps of urban areas, color-coded by how "secure" neighborhoods would be for home loans. Here's the RVA map - guess what they based "security" on? 3/
Happy weekend VA! Earlier this week I tweeted out #VoteNoOn1, the redistricting commission amendment. I'm still a No, but feel a Prof's need to clarify after hearing from some folks on both sides #Thread 1/
Earlier I said we all want Non-partisan, but even A1 supporters say that's basically impossible. What we actually want is INDEPENDENCE. Current SB 5015 tries to specify criteria for citizen members beyond "party picks" so it would help if passed 2/
But doesn't get over the fact that legislators are on the commission, and that one or two of them could use their veto power for mischief. In an uneven partisan environment (where GOP routinely kicks Dems' ass on process/power) I don't see a way around that 3/
Good morning VA! As early voting ramps up around the state, now’s a good time to remind you to Vote NO on Amendment 1, which supposedly ensures fair redistricting. I’m not convinced. Here's why: #VoteNOon1 #Thread 1/
Background: you probably know that “redistricting” - drawing district lines for state legislature and Congress - is super important is for setting the political course of the next decade. So do politicians, which is why they try to control it 2/
A coalition pushed for fair, non-partisan process by 2019 deadline. (Constitutional amendment in VA needs GA to pass a resolution twice, then approved on voter ballot Q.) They didn't get it! Instead, they put in place a compromise
3/
Anyone check out the #RVAProtests "112 Days" show on @CBS6 last night? You can watch it on MSN (linked below), but I did so you don't have to. Two big thoughts: #Thread 1/
First, the doc not great on repping protestors. Some efforts to give voice to protest, but probably not central figures. I get it - it's hard to parse, there's no "President of the Movement," and lots of folks probably didn't want to talk
2/
But still - why so much freakin' Mark Holmberg? Why let him complain that protestors marched at Lee Circle but not Gilpin Court- and then ignore multiple anti-eviction actions? 3/ richmond.com/news/local/wat…