OpenAI's experiments in co-evolution (deep reinforcement learning and self-play) openai.com/blog/emergent-… reveals the emergent complexity of intentional agents competing and cooperating among themselves.
This kind of technology cannot be undersold. It's a paradigm shift not only in technological terms but also in scientific terms. Detractors who keep pitching expectation moderation are in fact performing a disservice to society as a whole.
Many investors lost their shirt when the dot-com burst. Yet society as a whole benefited wildly from the bust. Society discovered an extreme surplus of cheap fiber optics that accelerated progress in many other fronts.
Mass extinctions have beneficial effects for evolution. It's of course unfortunate for individuals but it does wonders for the collective whole. Thus, detractors of DL who worry more about an AI winter simply do not understand the dynamics of evolution.
It is bad enough that the general population is unaware of the progress of AI but "avoiding the AI winter" narrative is one way for the informed to shoot themselves in the foot by overthinking about the speed of progress. Nobody really understands the exact speed of innovation.
The value having precision about the velocity of progress is important when scarce resources are on the line.Humans have limited resources, more specifically our attention is a universally scarce resource.The velocity of progress is a guide to how much attention one should spare.
The AI Winter argument argues that there is sufficient uncertainty in AI progress that therefore one should not waste scarce resources on the activity. The flaw in the logic is that individuals scarcity can be someone else's abundance.
One can trace the acceleration of human innovation to the invention of credit. One can think of money as potential energy. By borrowing money from the future to fund the present, one essentially accelerates innovation.This borrowing happens when there is optimism.
In a world with pessimism where nothing ever makes progress, there is no incentive to borrow from the future to pay for the present. AI present velocity reveals that it is a no-brainer to borrow from the future to pay for the acceleration of the present.
Too few laymen understand that software development is a knowledge discovery process. Furthermore, its processes are meta-processes that involve the management of symbolic complexity.
These meta-processes can be applied to any human endeavor requiring collective development. The biggest companies in the world are software companies and the reason they are able to scale is that they have organizational processes superior to any other company.
Therefore, these companies are intrinsically knowledge discovery behemoths at scale. They can sustain their growth because of their existing processes and the constant influx of new talent.
The damn problem with the COVID19 virus is that it keeps changing! Simple minds think the changing explanations are an indicator of a conspiracy theory without realizing that the virus is outsmarting them.
It's just stunning how something that isn't really alive can hijack people's minds. Isn't it enough that they can hijack people's bodies? Now we have governors signing laws to accelerate its spread.
Children who mingle in schools are the main vector for this virus's spread. The US Surgeon General got it through his kid. If you want to accelerate the deaths of grandparents, you spread the virus through their grandchildren.
Americans are a very odd lot. You have a deadly weapon, that is purportedly manufactured by a known enemy, yet many have become a catalyst for the spread of this deadly weapon. In political jargon, they call these 'useful idiots'. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_id…
I could be talking about the covid19 virus or anti-democratic Russian tactics, which would apply to the same set of Americans. There is something odd here where so many find it to be their duty to work against their own interests.
It's also interesting that the pandemic is still at its peak in Russia. So perhaps to understand a useful idiot, we have to understand how people in Russia tick. Why is it that Russia is so backward as a nation?
It's difficult to understand how the Russian army can occupy Ukraine which is the size of Texas. It's next to impossible to do if the population (44m) isn't on your side. One would need to enlist a sizeable number of accomplices within the population.
Certainly, if the permafrost is hard enough, the tanks can move unimpeded, but logistics win wars. The problem with good logistics is that it doesn't come for free, it's expensive.
Anyway, none of this makes sense. I don't see the Russians moving tanks into Ukraine when the temperature is around 40F. That's a muddy quagmire! Also, tanks aren't as effective inside urban places.
Did anyone notice that sustained nuclear fusion is a good analogy to achieve unlimited human potential? To tame the unlimited energy of a nuclear fusion one needs a magnetic bottle that is adaptive enough to constrain the reactor from destroying itself.
Doesn't this remind you of dystopian movies like "Fahrenheit 451", "The Giver", "Equilibrium" and "V for Vendetta" where art and emotion are removed from society so that humans avoid their own destructive fate?
In each of these movies, the antagonist are institutions that are so rigid in their micromanagement of lives that we've what it means to be human. Do we not also see it in ourselves when we are rigid in our own thinking that we've lost our emotions and thus our humanity?
Let's not forget that FaceBook began by pandering to exclusivity (i.e. owning an email address in a prestigious university). All economics requires scarcity, exclusivity is a kind of scarcity that exists in a world of abundance.
Many don't recognize the two sides of decentralized ledger technology (i.e. blockchain). On one side is the idea that exclusive control of the network is prevented. On the flip side, the network makes possible human notions of scarcity in a virtual world of abundance.