@GaryMarcus@ylecun I agree here. The human brain likely has innate priors to learn faster. Infants learn skills in the same order as other infants. This suggests that there exists a meta-learning algorithm that is innate in humans.
@GaryMarcus@ylecun Primates also learn in the same order as human infants up to a certain age. After some threshold age they cannot keep up. This could be due to a resource constraint or a missing meta-learning algorithm.
@GaryMarcus@ylecun There exists an innate meta-learning algorithm for mammals that leads to the sophistication found in primates, dogs, dolphins, whales, elephants, and seals. We need to discover this first before we can know if the human meta-learning algorithm is different.
@GaryMarcus@ylecun Is the mammalian or human meta-learning algorithm different from the birds and octopuses? If it's the same, then this is evidence of the independence on hardware. I don't know if there are studies that have studied this.
@GaryMarcus@ylecun We do know the commonality between octopuses, birds and intelligent mammals. We all know that they have REM states in sleep. Animals with more innate priors (i.e. Ibex) appear not to require additional brain plasticity as evidence by dreaming states.
@GaryMarcus@ylecun The argument of nature vs nurture can be framed in terms of the Computer Science idea of eager vs lazy evaluation. A case of this is known as pre-mature optimization. Brain plasticity allows deferred evaluation which is a case of loose coupling in time.
@GaryMarcus@ylecun Another phrase that is more familiar would be "late binding". In fact, the entire history of computer science consist of innovation of the increase of late binding. medium.com/intuitionmachi…
@GaryMarcus@ylecun In fact, Ockham's Razor which is a popular principle in formulating theories is a subset of the Loose Coupling principle. Loose Coupling is an information dependency principle and the lower the dependency the more flexible the architecture.
Too few laymen understand that software development is a knowledge discovery process. Furthermore, its processes are meta-processes that involve the management of symbolic complexity.
These meta-processes can be applied to any human endeavor requiring collective development. The biggest companies in the world are software companies and the reason they are able to scale is that they have organizational processes superior to any other company.
Therefore, these companies are intrinsically knowledge discovery behemoths at scale. They can sustain their growth because of their existing processes and the constant influx of new talent.
The damn problem with the COVID19 virus is that it keeps changing! Simple minds think the changing explanations are an indicator of a conspiracy theory without realizing that the virus is outsmarting them.
It's just stunning how something that isn't really alive can hijack people's minds. Isn't it enough that they can hijack people's bodies? Now we have governors signing laws to accelerate its spread.
Children who mingle in schools are the main vector for this virus's spread. The US Surgeon General got it through his kid. If you want to accelerate the deaths of grandparents, you spread the virus through their grandchildren.
Americans are a very odd lot. You have a deadly weapon, that is purportedly manufactured by a known enemy, yet many have become a catalyst for the spread of this deadly weapon. In political jargon, they call these 'useful idiots'. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_id…
I could be talking about the covid19 virus or anti-democratic Russian tactics, which would apply to the same set of Americans. There is something odd here where so many find it to be their duty to work against their own interests.
It's also interesting that the pandemic is still at its peak in Russia. So perhaps to understand a useful idiot, we have to understand how people in Russia tick. Why is it that Russia is so backward as a nation?
It's difficult to understand how the Russian army can occupy Ukraine which is the size of Texas. It's next to impossible to do if the population (44m) isn't on your side. One would need to enlist a sizeable number of accomplices within the population.
Certainly, if the permafrost is hard enough, the tanks can move unimpeded, but logistics win wars. The problem with good logistics is that it doesn't come for free, it's expensive.
Anyway, none of this makes sense. I don't see the Russians moving tanks into Ukraine when the temperature is around 40F. That's a muddy quagmire! Also, tanks aren't as effective inside urban places.
Did anyone notice that sustained nuclear fusion is a good analogy to achieve unlimited human potential? To tame the unlimited energy of a nuclear fusion one needs a magnetic bottle that is adaptive enough to constrain the reactor from destroying itself.
Doesn't this remind you of dystopian movies like "Fahrenheit 451", "The Giver", "Equilibrium" and "V for Vendetta" where art and emotion are removed from society so that humans avoid their own destructive fate?
In each of these movies, the antagonist are institutions that are so rigid in their micromanagement of lives that we've what it means to be human. Do we not also see it in ourselves when we are rigid in our own thinking that we've lost our emotions and thus our humanity?
Let's not forget that FaceBook began by pandering to exclusivity (i.e. owning an email address in a prestigious university). All economics requires scarcity, exclusivity is a kind of scarcity that exists in a world of abundance.
Many don't recognize the two sides of decentralized ledger technology (i.e. blockchain). On one side is the idea that exclusive control of the network is prevented. On the flip side, the network makes possible human notions of scarcity in a virtual world of abundance.