#NavyHill, #6thStreet, #StoneBrewing, #Redskins - why does it seem like the city is always involved in a “big shiny project”? Why the same developers, law firms, wealthy elites? Why always #RVA Voldemort Tom Farrell? Social science has answers - 4 of them. #Thread
1/
1st: LOCAL POLITICS ALWAYS ABOUT LAND USE. Paul Peterson notes cities try to "enhance economic position" - basically need to expand tax base to do more stuff for citizens. Main tool? LAND USE - zoning, development incentives, etc. press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book…
2/
2nd: This means PROPERTY INTERESTS DOMINATE. Landowners want economic development to ensure that their property values go up; city leaders need these owners/developers to grow tax base
3/
Harvey Molotch calls this #GrowthMachine - default focus of local pol is economic growth through development of buildings and land jstor.org/stable/2777096
4/
We see power of growth machine when land interests threaten exit (easier in global economy) - corporation can get a sweet development deal from a city by threatening to move their offices or factory to another city or state (cough cough #HQ2)
5/
But equally powerful: "fixed place" local developers, hospitals, and utility companies like #DominionPower - local networks, political connections, and real estate portfolios that make it hard to move, but enhance their power
6/
Powerful figures in these interests often taken on role of local booster - out of a sense of noblesse oblige or profit-motive (or both). They have immense influence. Since Tom Farrell wants a coliseum, we all have to consider it
7/
3rd: WEALTHY INTERESTS OUTLAST POLITICIANS. #LevarStoney is reform mayor during election that rejects #BigShinyProjects - but he fully supports #NavyHill. Why? He'll be long gone before check comes due, but also seems easier to work with #GrowthMachine
8/
Clarence Stone argues alliance of economic and political elites can form a ruling “regime” that lasts over multiple elections, officials, and administrations. Hard to resist - what if most powerful man in VA says he can solve all your city's problems? kansaspress.ku.edu/subjects/polit…
9/
4th: LEADERS WANT TO LEAVE A LEGACY. City leaders are humans too. Seeing your name on a plaque helps a city leader know that no matter their faults they have accomplished something in this world
10/
(Plus politics: as Mike Royko said about Chicago Mayor Richard J. Daley: “The fastest way to show people that something is happening is to build things.”)
11/
Can the #GrowthMachine be defeated? Sure, through institutions. #NavyHillCommission taking its job seriously. @Richmond300 has model process of public input (I just hope city takes results seriously). Plus people can organize, as they have always done.
12/
As I prep my political theory class for this fall, I'm struck that one thing the TX abortion law should hammer home, and that some of us sometimes forget: conservatism is openly hostile towards individual freedom #Thread
1/
As ideology, conservatism embraces ancient ideas of difference. Plato's Republic imagines world where people are sorted according to innate characteristics; Aristotle thought democracy was worst form of government. To Greeks, some people just better suited to rule than others
2/
In 1790, Brit Edmund Burke essentially launched conservatism by criticizing the French revolution. Liberty is fine, Burke argued, but what if it's the liberty of a "madman" or "murderer"? Freedom needs constraints, and isn't for everyone
3/
As #VAGOP convention approaches, candidates talking about banning "critical race theory" from our schools. We know that racist appeals work on many white voters (hi Donald!) but this one is especially insidious. Here's why #Thread
1/
First, #CriticalRaceTheory is term for some pretty high-level scholarship and theoretical work, like real pomo philosophy shit. Crenshaw, Delgado, Bell. Mostly influential in legal theory. Time mag explainer (h/t to @bluevirginia) is just fine: 2/ time.com/5891138/critic…
Key here: CRT is WAY less influential than critics claim, even in theory circles. Often mocked by traditional establishment voices. Just check this '98 Cornell law review article that claims to take CRT seriously, but actually drips w mockery/disdain 3/ scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewconten…
Background: the federal govt's Home Owners' Loan Corporation was a New Deal org aimed at helping people keep their homes post-Depression. Financially, it did pretty well - even turning a small profit 2/ trumanlibrary.gov/library/public…
But to "help" mortgage lenders, they generated maps of urban areas, color-coded by how "secure" neighborhoods would be for home loans. Here's the RVA map - guess what they based "security" on? 3/
Happy weekend VA! Earlier this week I tweeted out #VoteNoOn1, the redistricting commission amendment. I'm still a No, but feel a Prof's need to clarify after hearing from some folks on both sides #Thread 1/
Earlier I said we all want Non-partisan, but even A1 supporters say that's basically impossible. What we actually want is INDEPENDENCE. Current SB 5015 tries to specify criteria for citizen members beyond "party picks" so it would help if passed 2/
But doesn't get over the fact that legislators are on the commission, and that one or two of them could use their veto power for mischief. In an uneven partisan environment (where GOP routinely kicks Dems' ass on process/power) I don't see a way around that 3/
Good morning VA! As early voting ramps up around the state, now’s a good time to remind you to Vote NO on Amendment 1, which supposedly ensures fair redistricting. I’m not convinced. Here's why: #VoteNOon1 #Thread 1/
Background: you probably know that “redistricting” - drawing district lines for state legislature and Congress - is super important is for setting the political course of the next decade. So do politicians, which is why they try to control it 2/
A coalition pushed for fair, non-partisan process by 2019 deadline. (Constitutional amendment in VA needs GA to pass a resolution twice, then approved on voter ballot Q.) They didn't get it! Instead, they put in place a compromise
3/
Anyone check out the #RVAProtests "112 Days" show on @CBS6 last night? You can watch it on MSN (linked below), but I did so you don't have to. Two big thoughts: #Thread 1/
First, the doc not great on repping protestors. Some efforts to give voice to protest, but probably not central figures. I get it - it's hard to parse, there's no "President of the Movement," and lots of folks probably didn't want to talk
2/
But still - why so much freakin' Mark Holmberg? Why let him complain that protestors marched at Lee Circle but not Gilpin Court- and then ignore multiple anti-eviction actions? 3/ richmond.com/news/local/wat…