Dont try divisiveness. I have great respect for the individuals you named, have known Elst & Shourie for decades - better than you.
What you dont seem to know is that this kurukshetra has MANY FIGHTS, each needing leaders who specialize.
In the context of DP (contd)
What you dont seem to know is that this kurukshetra has MANY FIGHTS, each needing leaders who specialize.
In the context of DP (contd)
https://twitter.com/WHF_Global/status/1184446051048013824
My focus was on Freudian Psychoanalysis led by Wendy Doniger, leader of the parampara that DP is chela of. Shourie, Elst, Ram Swarup, etc each had different specialties in who they targeted.
Superficial "activists" like u often collapse all the enemies as one.
Superficial "activists" like u often collapse all the enemies as one.
Imagine if someone becomes specialist on study of Turkey as India's enemy, you cannot hit him by saying that persons XYZ already did that same work because they analyzed Pakistan, China, etc.
Each enemy is different & distinct ==> requires new & fresh purva-paksha by us.
Each enemy is different & distinct ==> requires new & fresh purva-paksha by us.
@WHF_Global - Since you have not done purva-paksha yourself, you dont understand that it is target specific.
My targets have been the US based heads of the Indology paramparas from which India based sepoys & #breakingindia forces get nurtured.
Other researchers have their targets
My targets have been the US based heads of the Indology paramparas from which India based sepoys & #breakingindia forces get nurtured.
Other researchers have their targets
@WHF_Global - it would be better if you pick some target that is not adequately being pursued by our side, and specialize in purva-paksha. Meanwhile, dont spread divisiveness among scholars who work hard & who DO NOT have issues with each other. Thank you.🙂
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
