So I now house my family of four in a studio apartment. It raises some eyebrows, but that's about the worst of it. Here's how and why we do it:
Read Thoreau: material stuff is mostly liability. You only NEED to keep the vital heat in your body via food, fuel and insulation, which is easy and cheap. Everything else is either confused distraction or directly and explicitly enables philosophical, social, political life.
Sleeping: We use Japanese-style futon for sleeping on the floor. All four of us in one bed of two mattresses. More room than we're currently using. During the day, they fold up neatly and become our couches.
You'd think the kids need room space, but they don't really, and inside is bad for kids. We take them to the park, the grocery store, parties. Home is for eating, sleeping, and storage.
We have more space in our studio apartment than we use, to be honest.
For eating, we kneel on cushions at a coffee-table. The coffee tables can double as couch/bench. Minimal! The big trick is rearranging the space for different use cases, and objects doing double duty.
We do a small prayer before every meal, which my son now insists on.
We do have chairs (though we haven't rescued them from storage yet; just moved). Chairs are good for general sitting, hosting, playing music, working at the desk.
Even Thoreau had three chairs in his tiny house (much smaller than ours).
For cooking, most studio apartments have a perfectly adequate kitchen for preparing the kind of simple whole foods we eat.
With less space, you do have to stay on top of the dishes a bit more, but constraints that force discipline are good for you.
We keep our wardrobes small enough to fit in a few drawers. Most people have too many clothes. Even @tannerguzy says this: the key is having versatile quality items that work well together. Quantity is a distraction.
My general philosophy is to keep the necessities to an absolute minimum, and own as little stuff as possible, taking advantage of versatility and multiple uses. Thoreau teaches that material things are mostly liability: storage, upkeep, attention, implied need to be used.
Once you isolate and solve the necessities (keep the heat in) with very little, the purpose of all other wealth becomes much clearer: it is purely tools for the accomplishment of social, intellectual, spiritual, and political goals. Subordinate your wealth to your plans.
Simplicity isn't just about frugality, but also clarity, which is much more valuable: owning too much begets confusion about what your stuff is even for, and whether it owns you, or you own it. Things have psychological power: don't let them get disorganized or out of hand!
The spiritual element of material things, their power over your own psyche, the need to relate to them in sometimes spiritual ways, and above all the need to keep them disciplined and tidy is at the heart of @MarieKondo's animist approach to home living, as well.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People get sick sometimes with transmissible viruses like cold, flu, and COVID. We can either accept that gracefully, or radically transform society for the worse before being gracelessly forced to accept it anyways.
Let it rip.
In Feb 2020, lockdowns and extreme caution were warranted. We didn't know how bad the virus was, and we thought our society could fight it.
By June, when lockdown enforcement became a politicized double standard, it was obvious we weren't going to win without a miracle.
Many hoped for a vaccine miracle. But the vaccine only partially helped. By then the vaccine was politicized too, and political tensions were at highest for decades, so no one was in a position to publicly notice that the virus was, on the grand scale, simply not that bad.
Was talking to a friend the other day and this came up again. I'm going to refine the take:
"Based" is becoming what the boomer counterculture was. Radical and interesting at first, but rapidly taken over by imitators and yuppies and people for whom it's a fashion scene.
A fashion scene can definitely be the coolest underground social phenomenon, but it's just that.
The trouble is that because such a thing is so obviously a pile of resources for the taking, anything built on it will be fake, because fakers are faster than substance.
And this is the ultimate condemnation. Once its coolness of something becomes legible, it's all over. It's either already established with a centralized hierarchy (eg apple computing) or it's getting eaten by grifters and watered down (boomer counterculture).
Mainstream computing will become highly controlled and integrated with the dysfunction of our political-economic order.
This just raises the importance of irrational guerrilla computing projects that preserve self-sufficiency and freedom of spirit at the cost of utility.
The reason is subtle: it's not that guerrilla computing will ever become politically significant in itself, but maintaining some ecosystem of life outside the totalitarian borg-state is necessary for overall ecosystem resilience, and for the training of new dynasties.
New dynasties sweep in from the steppes and deserts when the borg-states become decadent. They are formed out on the fringes where life is hard but free. This generalizes to new ideas, paradigms, and religions. Not just new elites.
Class oppression in America is largely based on access to secret knowledge that is never written down. This knowledge forms character, habits, social networks, info bubbles, and what positions you get herded into.
This is partially an evolved response to the social/legal inability to discriminate directly combined with the necessity of class hierarchy and distinction. But I wonder whether it has always been this way.
Most people's self-concept is a false consciousness that basically justifies and perpetuates their own oppression.
The reason architecture, the arts, etc collapse between 1914 and 1945 is the obvious one: the people who built things like that lost the wars. Even on the "victorious" side, the people who won were the factional enemies of this aesthetic.
because America is a dysfunctional vampire-state that destructively consumes human capital.
We've been limping along on prewar central European fumes for decades. At some point, we run out.
People act there there is some infinite pile of high-quality human capital overseas, and we can just plunder it indefinitely. It doesn't work like that. At some point, you have to get good at generating human capital.
America has never been good at this.
Human capital generation looks like free independent productive subcultures sharpening themselves over generations.
Instead, we aggressively converge everything into the monoculture, shuffle off the high-quality people into Harvard, and apply their efforts to nonsense. Few kids.