TIL one of the main reasons Robert E. Lee avoiding being hanged for treason was... Ulysses S. Grant telling Andrew Johnson not to do it.
Grant was “bitterly opposed” to the U.S. annexation of Texas, and viewed the Mexican-American War “as one of the most unjust ever waged by a stronger against a weaker nation.”
The American casualty ratio during the Mexican-American War was “slightly higher than Union losses in the Civil War, seven times greater than that of WWII, and twenty-four times that of Vietnam.”
(These passages are from: powells.com/book/-97806848…)
Grant on the Confederates trying to break up the U.S.: “There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots and I want hereafter to be ranked with the latter.”
“In one of the most blatant examples of state-sponsored anti-Semitism in American history, Grant expelled all members of the Jewish faith from the Department of the Tennessee.”
Lincoln was incredibly lenient toward Confederate leadership upon surrender.

For the Confederate military: “Let them go, officers and all.” For the political leadership: “If Jefferson Davis and his colleagues escaped abroad, the president wouldn’t mind.”
More details on how Grant specifically intervened to prevent Robert E. Lee from going to trial to face punishment for treason—despite Andrew Johnson’s wishes:
1866: Grant “feared [Andrew] Johnson might be planning a coup d’état to prevent a Republican victory in November... Grant was sufficiently concerned about Johnson’s plans that he quietly ordered the removal of weapons and ammunition from federal arsenals in the South.”
Grant on Andrew Johnson’s impeachment, which Grant supported: “I would impeach him because he is such an infernal liar.”
Turns out the Dominican Republic was so eager in the late 1860s to become part of the U.S. that their government offered to... just unilaterally declare the country annexed to the U.S.:
During his first term, Grant pushed for the (eventual) creation of an Indian state—but the push fell apart due to demand for federal control, and pushback from railroads/white settlers:
Some of the means with which Grant and his admin crushed the KKK/deterred white rifle clubs: sending in federal troops, announcing proclamations of “insurrection,” issuing thousands of indictments.
With 1876 election results still disputed, *multiple* members of Grant’s cabinet—including the Sec. of War—lobbied for “immediate military intervention in Louisiana to secure a GOP victory.” (Grant declined.)
“Whether the deal concluded [to give the 1876 election to Hayes in return for white autocracy in the South] was necessary is open to doubt.”
Grant on a second potential American Civil War:

“I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon’s, but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition, and ignorance on the other.”
Amazing scene post-presidency, with Grant sitting down with Tsar Alexander II in St. Petersburg to discuss US-Russia relations and US-Plains Indians policy (cc @seansrussiablog)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Casey Michel 🇰🇿

Casey Michel 🇰🇿 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cjcmichel

Feb 20
Nine years ago, I enrolled in the Master’s program in Russia, Eurasia, and Eastern Europe Studies from Columbia’s @HarrimanInst.

At the time, I remember conversations about whether we should even have a Russia studies program. (Thankfully, we still do!)
One of the best courses there was called “Ukrainian Foreign Policy.” There were three of us total (plus @Argemino!) in the fall of 2013.

Each week, we met to dissect the latest on Yanukovych’s government, Orange Revolution legacies, the potential EU Association Agreement, etc.
And each week, things got slowly less hopeful. Yanukovych started to stall. The potential for signing the Association Agreement slowly got further and further away.

It was a bit like watching a slow-motion car crash, week in, week out.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 17
Way too many people still think the latest Russia crisis is only (or even primarily) about Ukraine potentially joining NATO.
Does Ukrainian membership in NATO play a role in Russia’s security posture/threats of invasion? Sure. Is it the primary motivator? Hardly—otherwise a simple question of Ukrainian security neutrality would abnegate the bulk of the current/forthcoming crisis.
This remains the best thread on why the Kremlin’s designs—colonialist, revanchist, geo-economic—on Ukraine go far, far beyond NATO membership.

And why the solution of a “neutral Ukraine” is somewhere between myopic and a dangerous canard.

Read 7 tweets
Feb 16
The time has come: We have to pass legislation barring former Western politicians from working with authoritarian regimes, and their related proxies.

Me and @BLSchmitt in @ForeignPolicy: foreignpolicy.com/2022/02/15/ger…
Gerhard Schröder is arguably Putin’s greatest lobbyist. But he’s no longer unique.

Former British and French PMs, Polish presidents, US senators, an entire range of Austrian leaders—all have raced to become shills for kleptocrats after leaving office.

foreignpolicy.com/2022/02/15/ger…
The first step: a joint Western statement announcing that the practice of former officials working for authoritarian or kleptocratic regimes or their related proxies after leaving office must end.

Announce—publicly and jointly—that the norms have changed. Image
Read 4 tweets
Feb 14
A false flag attack. A revanchist dictatorship in the Kremlin. An unprompted invasion of a western neighbor—and a bloody failure for the entire world to see.

My longread for @POLITICOMag on what the Soviet invasion of Finland can teach us: politico.com/news/magazine/…
The most striking statistic from the Soviet-Finnish Winter War:

The Soviet Union—which planned the time and place of the invasion—still had over *five times as many casualties as the Finns*, with a higher casualty-per-day rate than later battles like *Stalingrad*.
Stalin thought grabbing territory from tiny, prone Finland would be easy. He thought invasion would be a cakewalk.

He was impressively, incredibly wrong.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 13
Great read from @Russian_Starr on why progressives (especially in the U.S.) should be fully on board with supporting the defense of Ukraine from Russian neo-imperialism: foreignpolicy.com/2022/02/11/pro…
One thing that *feels* different from 2014 is that the U.S. left seems far more unified on backing Ukraine—and that differences are relegated only to policy (i.e. certain arms packages, certain sanctions crafting, etc).
Both the Jill Stein wing of US-as-root-of-all-evil foreign policy and the Chapo-style version of cynicism over everything seem effectively dead on the U.S. left, at least in terms of any influence on foreign policy and Ukraine. (Which are both fantastic developments.)
Read 6 tweets
Feb 12
Two things I’d like to see more of:

1) Those arguing that the West offered a “pledge” to forego NATO expansion grapple with the fact that Yeltsin and Putin both openly flirted with joining NATO in the 1990s/early 2000s.
2) Self-proclaimed realists digest the clear reality that the (post-colonialist) Kremlin’s designs on Ukraine go far, far beyond the simple question of Ukrainian NATO membership.
+1 Not nearly enough grappling with what would have happened if NATO actually *had* stopped expanding. (Polish nuclear program? Hungarian irredentism? A far, far, far worse security landscape on Russia’s western flank?)
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(