My timeline is full of people having a pop at James for this piece.
One thing I would say is, fans tend to put high value on the obvious and highly visible, but a low/null value on things that are subtle and low-visibility.
What I mean by that is, with goalkeepers we tend to jump on the ones who make obvious errors, such as Karius. The reason being it is easy to see, everyone else will see it, you can't be wrong calling it out - it is highly visible and memorable.
It's low hanging fruit analysis.
However, a player probably makes only a few of those big errors per season and they tend to be random, unpredictable & not really linked to anything specific that is a problem.
What coaches look for, are things that are a problem underpinning an aspect of the game - limitations
So a goalkeeper that can't deal with high shots and tip them over the bar, a keeper who has slow feet to move across his line (cutbacks, crosses), a keeper with weak wrists &/or parrying shots back into danger for simple rebounds, a keeper who can't catch the ball.
Or even just basic positioning. I still remember seeing a pundit on Italian television highlighting how with good positioning, those world class saves become routine saves - but more importantly, those shots just out of reach become saveable.
"But everything is right at him"
Things like that are a problem all the time. Every game. If another team scouts it well and can find a way to expose it, then you can target the player and get an easy goal out of them. This is a limitation that should have been solved in youth levels and now is too late to solve
This is why Klopp seems to like Lovren. He doesn't have any limitation that hinders his performance that can be targeted. Sure, he struggled to deal with Aguero's foot speed when he feigned shots - show me a CB who doesn't. There won't be many - that is why Aguero is so effective
He makes absolute howlers, completely at random that are highly visible and easy to jump on. He also has the worst injury record out of a collection of second choice CB's that spend a lot of time injured.
For a long time he was preferred over Matip as Matip was far too passive for the Premier League and it was getting exposed. He was letting the ball bounce in dangerous areas, he wasn't challenging for headers he felt he might not win, things that would concern Klopp.
He doesn't do this anymore though - and maybe this was just an adaptation process with him that he needed to get through.
Likewise, with Gomez, there was always the concern with how he seemed to lose the flight of the ball in the air. While his volume and success rate of
aerial duels is still some way off our other three central defenders, this is no longer the big concern it once was. He is around league average in this sense now while being legitimately world class on the ground. Few players get anything out of him and he has pace for days!
So that is why Klopp still trusts Lovren even when it seems most of the fanbase no longer do. They see him as a disaster waiting to happen while Klopp sees him as a defender who wins most of his duels, whether on the deck or in the air and doesn't have any exposable limitations.
He also gives him some leeway on poor performances when he doesn't have any rhythm where the fanbase perhaps does not.
He'll almost certainly moves on this summer, but until then it seems Klopp will keep trusting him when injuries require him to. Especially if we keep winning.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It also highlights how football twitter actually knows fuck all about football.
People think all you need for 'ball knowledge' is to have watched football and have an opinion. But if know nothing about it, all you are doing it continue to watch something you don't understand.
None of the goals were counter attacks. This is Spurs building out from the back on the first goal. City pressed high up on Spurs. So all Spurs had to do was move the ball forward quickly to cut out City's press before their line had a chance to react and retreat.
1 pass later
This is 2 passes later.
Just tore through City's press and exposed their defence. There was too much space in front and behind the defence so they got picked off. That isn't a counter attack by any definition of the word.
Matip has been nailed on this season but probably starts less and less with the emergence of Konate. I also said from the start this is a rehab season for Joe and we take it super careful with him. He will play
But I think it will be split more between Matip & Konate going forward and eventually, Konate will be 1st choice. He is a thoroughbred.
I think Hendo has started a lot more this season due to the fact that we haven't been able to get our #8s fit.
Whether we sign someone new or the existing guys stay fit more, I think we see Hendo play less and less there and become what we seen this week - a Fabinho understudy.
Probably same story in attack. Jota played more because Bobby has been injured and once he is fit they maybe
But I also think if you have a player like Lukaku you have to build the attack around him. Hit him early sometimes with teh ball and get runners off him or midfielders supporting to build attacks.
Your most expensive #9 not touching the ball
within 30 yards of the opponents goal is wild though.
According to the official twitter - "a muscle injury". He finished the game midweek and it wasn't reported in the presser so I am guessing it is just tightness and with the squad we have, why risk him?
I would also add... the point of the chart is to convey information as quickly and easily as possible. So the more work someone has to put into understanding it - the worse the chart is.
It is read once you have approximately 6 seconds for someone to look at a data viz and buy
into it before you lose them. So if you are making hugely elaborate and complex charts - are you just wanting to show off what you can do or do you want the viewer to actually buy into it?
Which is why in an article I tend to have lots of visuals and the first one is always
something very informative and easy - like a basic bar chart. Something everyone can look at and get out of it what I need them to.