02/18/2018: Buttigieg literally says "[I] do henceforth and forthwith declare, most affirmatively and indubitably, unto the ages, that I do favor Medicare for All" pointing to an op-ed to demonstrate he's supported it since 2004.
The op-ed explicitly mentions single-payer.
2/14/2019, literally Buttigieg: "What is Medicare for All? It's a compromise. In the UK, you've got national health care. That would be the true left-wing position. The true right-wing position is free for all, all corporate -- the compromise position is a single-payer system."
Buttigieg's flip flop on Medicare for All is covered in more detail here. Team Buttigieg is now trying to save face by using the oldest trick in the politician's playbook which is to basically say "I agree with the goal but not the policy itself."
4/1/19: Buttigieg again speaks in exceedingly positive terms about Medicare for All "Single-payer, which is very much a compromise position between nationalized medicine and fully private payer and provider...that's the middle ground."
4/1/19: In talking up single-payer and Medicare for All, Buttigieg also says Obamacare was a "conservative tweak to our health care system...cooked up in the Heritage Foundation and piloted by a Republican governor."
7/19/2019: Among Democratic candidates, Buttigieg was second to Joe Biden in terms of pharmaceutical and health insurance donations. His list of donors includes executives from Aetna, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer and Indiana’s Eli Lilly & Co.
9/19/2019, Buttigieg shifts tactics and goes on the attack: “Anyone who lets the words Medicare for All escape their lips should tell us just as plainly how they plan to get there.”
9/19/2019, Buttigieg on the attack: "Warren is known for being straightforward and was extremely evasive when asked that question, and we've seen that repeatedly."
1) Big Pharma exec hosts a fundraiser for his campaign
2) Buttigieg says the "meaning" of Medicare for All has changed since he tweeted back in February of 2018.
[The meaning hasn't changed. Him cozying up to the industry has.]
Thaddeus Burns hosted a fundraiser for Buttigieg. He's the "Head of Government & Public Affairs" at Big Pharma giant Merck. Merck has repeatedly raised prices on drugs and vaccines.
In 2018, Merck spent nearly $7 million lobbying the federal government.
Buttigieg also held a fundraiser hosted by Eliav Barr, Senior VP at Big Pharma giant Merck.
Buttigieg also held a fundraiser hosted by Steve Holtzman, a pharmaceutical executive who is currently CEO of Decibel Therapeutics. Holtzman was previously an executive at Biogen and Millennium Pharmaceuticals (both on the no pharma donor pledge list).
During Holtzman's tenure as Biogen's Executive Vice President of Corporate Development, Biogen hiked prices on multiple sclerosis drugs by an average of 16% a year and charged $750,000 for a spinal muscular atrophy drug.
What happened this summer that made @PeteButtigieg decide to abandon Medicare for All?
I emailed @matthewkassel asking why his recent piece refers to @ninaturner as "controversial" and a "source of concern" but is neutral in describing DMFI, a SuperPAC running ads against Nina Turner that takes GOP money and whose board member called for burning all of Gaza.
For context, the piece includes six quotes from people backing @ninaturner's opponent, Shontel Brown, and zero quotes from people backing Nina Turner.
He said: "Fair enough, Waleed. Would you like to offer a comment on the ad buy? I can probably update the piece with a quote if you're interested in providing one."
I sent a quote naming DMFI's numerous controversies.
He replied saying they could no longer fit it in the story.
During a study abroad program, I took a bus from Jordan to Jerusalem alongside 7 (white American) students. When we got to the Israeli border, Israeli border agents told me I was in the wrong line (which was all white people) and pointed to a separate line that had only Arabs.
I told the Israeli border agents that I was with an American study abroad group and that I was an American citizen -- and that I wasn't Arab. My friends affirmed this. The border agents shouted "Wrong line!" and pointed to the Arab line.
The separate line took forever. Once I got there, the Israeli border agent asked me a bunch of questions: Why did I pack so light? What was my grandfather's first and last name? How often do I call relatives in Pakistan? Why didn't I speak Arabic even though my name is Arabic?
Powerful words from @AyannaPressley: "We cannot remain silent when our government sends $3.8 billion of military aid to Israel that is used to demolish Palestinian homes, imprison Palestinian children, and displace Palestinian families. A budget is a reflection of our values."
"The President and many other figures stated that Israel has a right to self-defense...but do Palestinians have a right to survive? Do we believe that? And if so, we have a responsibility to that as well." -@AOC
“I was raised in one of the most beautiful, Blackest cities in Americas — where movements for civil rights and social justice were birthed: the city of Detroit. So I can’t stand silent when injustice exists." -@RashidaTlaib
Reading Frederick Douglass's response to President Lincoln's first inaugural address in 1861.
"Threats of riot, rebellion, violence and assassination had been freely, though darkly circulated, as among the probable events to occur on that memorable day."
"The life of Mr. LINCOLN was believed, even by his least timid friends, to be in most imminent danger...he reached the Capital as the poor, hunted fugitive slave reaches the North...it is hard to think of anything more humiliating."
"The outgoing Administration, either by its treachery or weakness, or both, had allowed the Government to float to the very verge of destruction. Fear, amounting to agony in some minds, existed that the great American Republic would expire...the very moment of his inauguration."
Lots of people say: "American parties haven't been this polarized since the Civil War."
What happened then? Eric Foner faults a political system and democratic institutions designed by the Founding Fathers to compromise with slavery over multiracial democracy.
"As North and South increasingly took different paths...antagonistic value systems and ideologies could not be defused by the normal processes of political compromise, nor could they be contained."
[Eric Foner, Politics and Ideology in The Age of the Civil War]
"Once parties began to reorient themselves on sectional lines, a fundamental necessity of democratic politics -- that each party look upon the other as a legitimate alternative government -- was destroyed."
[Eric Foner, Politics and Ideology in The Age of the Civil War]
The debate we’ve been having with Jonathan Weisman over the past few weeks has made clear that the people who shape our national conversation can often be ignorant at best and biased at worst regarding some of the most important topics in our country today.
The back-and-forth with Weisman has demonstrated more than ever why we need more diverse newsrooms and why it’s important to have younger and more diverse voices in some of the most powerful rooms in our nation.
Weisman’s comments suggesting that Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar don’t represent the Midwest anymore than John Lewis represents the Deep South were deeply disturbing in the context of Trump’s continued racist attacks telling members to ‘go back’ to where they came from.