Reading Frederick Douglass's response to President Lincoln's first inaugural address in 1861.
"Threats of riot, rebellion, violence and assassination had been freely, though darkly circulated, as among the probable events to occur on that memorable day."
"The life of Mr. LINCOLN was believed, even by his least timid friends, to be in most imminent danger...he reached the Capital as the poor, hunted fugitive slave reaches the North...it is hard to think of anything more humiliating."
"The outgoing Administration, either by its treachery or weakness, or both, had allowed the Government to float to the very verge of destruction. Fear, amounting to agony in some minds, existed that the great American Republic would expire...the very moment of his inauguration."
"Once in Washington, Mr. LINCOLN found himself in the thick atmosphere of treason on the one hand, and a cowardly, sentimental and deceitful profession of peace on the other."
"Does he expose and rebuke the enemies of his country, the men who are bent upon ruling or ruining the country? Not a bit of it. But at the very start he seeks to court their favor, to explain himself where nobody misunderstands him."
"Aside from the inhuman coldness of the sentiment, it was a weak and inappropriate utterance to such an audience, since it could neither appease nor check the wild fury of the rebel Slave Power."
"Any but a blind man can see that the disunion sentiment of the South does not arise from any misapprehension of the disposition of the party represented by Mr. LINCOLN."
"All know that the masses at the North (the power behind the throne) had determined to take and keep this Government out of the hands of the slave-holding oligarchy, and administer it hereafter to the advantage of free labor as against slave labor."
"It was, therefore, weak, uncalled for and useless for Mr. LINCOLN to begin his Inaugural Address by thus at the outset prostrating himself before the foul and withering curse of slavery."
"The time and the occasion called for a very different attitude. Weakness, timidity and conciliation towards the tyrants and traitors had emboldened them to a pitch of insolence which demanded an instant check."
"The occasion was one for honest rebuke, not for palliations and apologies. The slaveholders should have been told that their barbarous system of robbery is contrary to the spirit of the age."
"Indeed, if compromise could possibly save the Union, the Union could easily be saved; but thanks to the spirit of tyrants, they want no compromise."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
02/18/2018: Buttigieg literally says "[I] do henceforth and forthwith declare, most affirmatively and indubitably, unto the ages, that I do favor Medicare for All" pointing to an op-ed to demonstrate he's supported it since 2004.
The op-ed explicitly mentions single-payer.
2/14/2019, literally Buttigieg: "What is Medicare for All? It's a compromise. In the UK, you've got national health care. That would be the true left-wing position. The true right-wing position is free for all, all corporate -- the compromise position is a single-payer system."
The debate we’ve been having with Jonathan Weisman over the past few weeks has made clear that the people who shape our national conversation can often be ignorant at best and biased at worst regarding some of the most important topics in our country today.
The back-and-forth with Weisman has demonstrated more than ever why we need more diverse newsrooms and why it’s important to have younger and more diverse voices in some of the most powerful rooms in our nation.
Weisman’s comments suggesting that Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar don’t represent the Midwest anymore than John Lewis represents the Deep South were deeply disturbing in the context of Trump’s continued racist attacks telling members to ‘go back’ to where they came from.
Democrats who voted with Republicans for Mitch McConnell's bill:
Allred
Axne
Beatty
Bera
Bishop (GA)
Blunt Rochester
Brindisi
Brownley (CA)
Bustos
Carbajal
Cartwright
Case
Casten (IL)
Castor (FL)
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Cooper
Costa
Courtney
Cox (CA)
Craig
Crist
Crow
Cuellar
Cummings
Cunningham
Davids (KS
Davis (CA)
Dean
DelBene
Delgado
Demings
Doyle, Michael F.
Eshoo
Finkenauer
Fletcher
Foster
Frankel
Fudge
Garamendi
Golden
Gonzalez (TX)
Gottheimer
Green, Al (TX)
Harder (CA)
Hayes
Heck
Himes
Horn, Kendra S.
Houlahan
Hoyer
Eric Foner's essay here about peak polarization and the breakdown of Congress before the Civil War is worth the read.
"A fundamental necessity of democratic politics -- that each party look upon the other as a legitimate alternative government -- was destroyed."
"As North and South increasingly took different paths of economic and social development and as...antagonistic value systems and ideologies grounded in the question of slavery emerged in these sections, the political system inevitably came under severe disruptive pressures."
"Because they brought into play basic values and moral judgments, the competing sectional ideologies could not be defused by the normal processes of political compromise, nor could they be contained within the existing inter-sectional political system."
"The principal tragedy of the Biden amendment...is that it would signal a major crumbling of Federal determination to achieve equal justice...the Biden amendment is thus a real threat not only to the gains of the sixties, but to decency in this society." [NYTimes editorial, 1975]
"Biden said his amendment was designed to prevent 'Federal bureaucrats' from ordering busing...civil rights lobbyists began an immediate campaign to overturn the Biden amendment....antibusing Senators led by Helms fought to retain the original Biden restrictions." [NYTimes, 1975]
"We are declaring war on all attempts to weaken or destroy affirmative action and civil rights enforcement," Hooks [NAACP Executive Director] said. "This includes such things as the attachment of riders & amendments onto bills such as the Eagleton‐Biden amendment." [NYTimes, '78]
After the horrific attacks on September 11, 2001, I witnessed two Americas.
One was an America of solidarity and coming together across our differences.
The other was an America of fear, hatred, and division.
Which America will we allow the memory of 9/11 to be used for today?
On September 11, 2001 -- a police officer pulled out his gun and pointed it at my mother for absolutely no reason as she drove us home from school. My siblings and I were in the car with her screaming and crying. She turned the car and we drove away.
I came home and my mom told me to turn on a movie for us to watch. I went to the kitchen to grab water and saw her crying over the kitchen sink. I didn't know what to say.