Of course all of these details are not mentioned or downplayed in the actual post, which presents a one-sided account of the allegations.
That's what tends to happen when a publication hires someone who has an extensive pattern of smearing political opponents as an editor.
That's what tends to happen when a publication hires someone who has an extensive pattern of smearing political opponents as an editor.
https://twitter.com/noonanjo/status/1211769395925671936
This highlights a key difference: You can be an open partisan on the left and still be promoted by mainstream journalists. Partisans on the right, especially ones with a record of extreme bias, would never get similar praise/promotion from mainstream journalists/outlets.
That's partially because most of those journalists don't even get exposed to partisans on the right. They almost exclusively follow other journalists (which are overwhelmingly liberal) and activists/partisans on the left.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
