Seaver Wang Profile picture
Dec 31, 2019 3 tweets 2 min read Read on X
2010: I finished HS and my 1st college term
2019: Fresh PhD, 4 mo. into my new role at @TheBTI.

Underlines for me that 2020s decarbonization + climate science work will be driven by people either *already* in field or *maybe* a lucky few who enter it in next ~5 yrs. (1/2) ImageImage
Our bold climate youth are an inspiration, but they can only do so much. Virtually all of the heavy lifting on climate this decade will be done by those already of age today. Don't burden the next gen with your hope for climate progress in 2020s - that's largely up to us. (2/2)
(All my fierce student activism aside, I felt relegated to the sidelines for the '10s. Youths today can likely relate strongly. We'll see what my impact is in the '20s, but we must work hard on behalf of youths left desperately trying to contribute via mvmts like #ClimateStrike)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Seaver Wang

Seaver Wang Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wang_seaver

Jan 28
From 2018 to 2023, silver use in solar PV cells has dropped by around half! (h/t @solar_chase)

Indeed academic papers (incl my own) tend to lean several yrs out of date. But industry intel is often paywalled, hence my habit of obnoxiously saving whatever nuggets I come across. Image
This is a clear example of why getting the stamp of peer-review doesn't mean something is right or the golden truth of science.

The most crucial round of peer review is really the permanent, continuous reactions/feedback from other experts once a study is actually publicly read.
I had assumed 10g per watt in my @Joule_CP paper, and had thought afterwards that might've been generous--but now it's right on the money.

Where I was way off was concrete, which is no longer used to anchor solar mountings in most utility-scale plants.

sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Read 4 tweets
Aug 15, 2023
Finally found time yesterday evening to take an unofficial satellite's-eye-view tour of the quasi-legendary Spruce Pine ultra-high-purity quartz mine in North Carolina.

It'd be an understatement to say this mine is currently key to the semiconductor + solar PV industries. 🧵 Image
IIRC, there's no other ultra-high-purity quartz mine of this scale, creating quite the potential bottleneck. A fire at a Spruce Pine facility may have contributed to the 2008 spike in polysilicon prices that arguably set off the last decade's solar boom.

Ultra-high-purity quartz is used for chip factory tools + crucibles used to contain molten silicon during manufacturing of ultrapure monocrystalline silicon ingots for chips + solar PV wafers via the Czochralski process. Pure quartz reduces impurities in the resulting product. Image
Read 11 tweets
Jul 27, 2023
Expanding energy access + clean energy in Asia + Africa won’t be as easy as many high-profile “100% renewable” papers suggest.

My new analysis shows how 100% RE models on Asia/Africa assume implausibly low costs + overlook key infrastructure challenges.

thebreakthrough.org/issues/energy/…
A flashy review paper from @ChristianOnRE + coauthors allegedly compiling hundreds of “100% renewable energy system” studies worldwide has received a lot of recent attention.

But this isn’t as big/rigorous of a field as such stated numbers might imply.

https://t.co/L23TRAoo9C
Image
Given my interests in Asia climate/energy policy, I noticed this review generating buzz early on, and was keen to dig deeper.

I noticed some funny things at a first glance (see linked thread), but over the past months I found much more serious issues...

Read 27 tweets
Jul 26, 2023
Untangling @enricomariutti's solar PV CO2 analysis as quoted by Shellenberger, Part 2

To his great credit, Enrico has made his calculations available, emphasizing he has nothing to hide.

In the same spirit I agreed to take a close look--and I think I've isolated the key issues. Image
I’m going to work through these numbers step by step below.

I’ve made a copy of Enrico’s calculations sheet that I’ll share here in case anybody else wants to take a look. Fair warning, the units change often and are not clearly denoted:

https://t.co/JvyYOngSGLdocs.google.com/spreadsheets/d…
Image
LIFETIME GENERATION:

Enrico uses the full equivalent hours method here, assuming generation at full capacity for the equivalent of 1137 hours/yr in Italy. Other key factors include 25 year lifetime, module degradation at 2% the 1st year + 0.5%/yr thereafter, and 5.6% grid losses Image
Read 20 tweets
Jul 25, 2023
I think this solar PV CO2 analysis from @enricomariutti promoted by Shellenberger is too high for reasons I'll point out.

Mariutti gives range of 170-250 g/kWh (!!)
Many literature estimates range 12-80 g/kWh
My rough estimate of upper-end is maybe a bit more than 72 g/kWh
I think Mariutti is correct to point out that much of the LCA literature is not sufficiently accounting for more CO2-intensive Chinese manufacturing.

But Mariutti then bases electricity inputs for silicon supply chain on a 2006 study

Mariutti's calcs: https://t.co/f8PBWRYC11enricomariutti.it/the-dirty-secr…
Image
I can appreciate why he likes the transparency of the 2006 study? But this misses the past 17 years of learning-by-doing as the solar-grade polysilicon sector has scaled many times over.

He takes 1.61 GWh/MWp as the electricity input for solar-grade polysilicon, for instance.
Read 16 tweets
Jul 18, 2023
🇺🇸 lacks key clean tech know-how writes @robinsonmeyer

I think I largely disagree. Was looking at battery-grade graphite, which 🇺🇸 virtually didn't make b4 now.

Seems we may hit 100k tons/yr by 2025 + 200k t/yr by 2028--and I might be missing projects.

nytimes.com/2023/07/17/opi…
I struggle to think of sectors/technologies where the US truly has a vacuum of essential know-how. Even in areas like upstream silicon-based solar factories or LFP batteries where the US is behind, we're competitive in alternative commercial tech (CtTe solar + NMC batteries)...
I do think @robinsonmeyer is correct in pointing out Ford/CATL's proposed Michigan LFP battery factory as a case where Congressional anti-China posturing has impeded a project arguably in the US's net interest.

But it's incorrect that the US can't make LFP batteries otherwise. Image
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(