Many frame this discussion as being all about high-skilled vs. low-skilled immigration; that's not the case. Many of the people coming from so-called “shithole countries” ARE high-skilled immigrants. See this research by @JeremyLNeufeld. 2/ niskanencenter.org/niskanen-immig…
A lot of the immigrants @realDonaldTrump disparages come to the U.S. through the diversity visa program. It’s one of the only ways that people from low-sending countries have any opportunity to immigrate to the United States. And it attracts some of the best and brightest. 3/
Diversity visa immigrants have higher levels of educational attainment and lower unemployment rates that other immigrants or other native-born Americans. 4/
The diversity visa provides other benefits that would be missed by selection on the basis of skill alone. Diversity itself has positive spillover effects on economic outcomes. See this paper: nber.org/papers/w10904. 6/ #Immigration#Diversity
Writing an entire group off with no willingness to see what they bring to the table is un-American. 7/ theatlantic.com/politics/archi…
The people from “shithole countries” deserve a chance to contribute to our country. Many of them come here with a higher level of skill than many Americans. All have the potential to add to our economy and our culture. 8/
Putting “America First" requires the U.S. to enact policies that will enhance American growth and prosperity. Reform, don't abolish, the diversity visa. Check it out here. 9/9 niskanencenter.org/niskanen-immig…
As we remember the president’s #shitholecountries comment, we must affirm immigrants who come here from all areas of the world to become part of our country.
NEW PAPER: The emerging “Abundance movement” isn’t left, right, or center—it’s a cross-cutting idea.
Here are six different camps emerging across the political spectrum. 👇
Red Plenty is Abundance for those who dream of state-led economic development aimed at publicly determined goals.
@ZohranKMamdani’s NYC mayorship, if it comes to pass, could be the tip of the spear of Left Abundance.
Cascadian Abundance combines deep environmental commitments, especially around the need for rapid decarbonization, a commitment to urbanism, and a faith in technological solutions to environmental problems.
.@heritage publishes regular iterations of its “Mandate for Leadership” with an agenda for the next Republican administration. The prior Trump admin implemented nearly 64% of its recommendations in its 1st year.
First, the Mandate would effectively close many avenues of legal immigration by:
❌Halting H2 visa programs
❌Closing the H-1B visa program to most recent grads
❌Leveraging entire visa categories as collateral in foreign policy negotiations
It would sabotage U.S. humanitarian relief by:
❌Repealing all TPS designations, stripping almost 700,000 of legal protection + work authorization.
❌Forbidding use of DHS staff time on DACA, Uniting for Ukraine, etc.
❌Prohibiting refugee vetting, ending refugee resettlement.
NEW PAPER: Manufactured housing is an affordable option in rural areas where land prices are low. They even promise to ease the housing crunch in coastal cities where land prices are high!
To clarify, we’re not talking about vacation trailers, or 1970’s-era mobile homes. Modern manufactured homes have strict standards for structural integrity and safety. They often look like homes built on-site, but they were assembled in a factory, like a car or an airplane.
Benefits of manufactured homes include: (1) They’re safer and more efficient to make, their materials don’t have to be exposed to the elements until the house is fully assembled, and (3) they can help improve quality of housing while driving costs down.
Before we enact any reform, we have to understand the political economy of our system: whom it empowers, whom it enriches, etc.
Answering these questions will rally opinion shapers around reform, protect reforms against backlash, and help avoid unintended consequences.
Here's how the conventional wisdom explains the political economy of housing: single-family homes and large lot sizes restrict the availability of housing to buyers who will pay at least as much in local taxes as they consume in public services, such as schools.