.@EsperDoD - #NDS says priority is first China then Russia. Must shift away from low intensity conflict to preparing for high intensity. Rogue states are secondary. Terrorism enduring background problem. 🎯 1/ #MSC2020
Speech will focus on Pentagon’s top problem: China. 2/
Xi is leading China faster and farther in wrong direction including more aggressive military posture. Intl community must wake up to what China presents. 3/
PLA increasingly operating well beyond its borders including Europe. (My take: Next 10 years we’ll be taken aback how far flung PLA will operations will be. WestPac remains priority theater though.) 4/
Beijing’s military expansion must be Europe’s concern too. 5/
PRC seeks to militarily modernize by 2035 and dominate Asia from a position of global preeminence by 2049. 6/
US seeks open and fair competition with China not conflict. All China needs to do is respect the rules and treat other countries w fairness and respect. 7/
.@DeptofDefense is implementing #NDS. W 21 budget DOD will make biggest RDTE investment ever while divesting from ill suited legacy systems. Also investing in AI, space, and other high tech 👍 8/
Not asking partners to reject engagement w China but that they hold China to right standards and be realistic. Short term costs for long term benefits. 9/
.@EsperDoD gives clear, strong speech on China & strategic vision and first question from moderator is on Afghanistan and Iraq. Perfect example of why strategic prioritization is hard. Why doesn’t media ask about PLA or 5G? 🙄 10/
Second question by other moderator on Huawei and European reaction. 👍 11/
.@EsperDoD : Bipartisan consensus on Huawei took time in US. Will take time in Europe. But optimistic. But can’t afford to ignore the threat. 12/
Oh wait ANOTHER question on Afghanistan. Seriously? And then a follow up!!! 13/
In response to good question from @IlvesToomas about what’s alternative, @EsperDoD admits a good point. Working on it! 14/
#NATO should focus on security or continent. Alliance has hit 30s targets. My take: That’s exactly right. NATO should hold down the fort in Europe by denying RF fait accompli option in East. Don’t lose the bubble.) 15/
Great stuff from @EsperDoD. Polite but to the point. Focused. China first. Europe should do its part by backing Econ and political efforts to induce good Chinese behavior while ensuring NATO security. 👍
Also great point from @EsperDoD when asked what NATO should do in Asia. His answer: Basically nothing. Focus on Europe and your region. Exactly right. 🎯
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It’s no wonder @VP & Liz Cheney are aligning against @realdonaldtrump.
More than anyone, he is taking on the uber-hawks in D.C. He’s made an essential effort and it’s taken exceptional vision and steadfastness on his part.
It’s a key reason why electing him is so vital. 1/
I vividly recall in 2016 when @realDonaldTrump was the first Republican leader to say publicly that the Iraq War was a huge mistake.
Everyone basically already knew that. But no other GOP leader had the courage to say it. He did. 2/
@realDonaldTrump An old expression goes: You can judge a man by his enemies. By this standard, President Trump comes out shining. 3/
"China thinks it will be able to invade Taiwan by 2027 and has developed a technology edge in many key areas—but it is artificial intelligence that may be the decisive factor should conflict erupt, Kendall said Oct. 29." 1/
Kendall: “They’re working very hard to meet that goal. I have no idea what Xi Jinping will do in 2027, but I am pretty sure that his military will tell him they’re ready, and we’ll be in a period of much greater risk.” 2/
"The Chinese invested in advanced tech—and stole U.S. intellectual property. As a result, Kendall said, they now have an advantage in cruise missiles and hypersonic weapons and are working to build one with targeting satellites and advanced, automated battle management systems."
“After four years of Biden's presidency, Moscow and Beijing stand together as the greatest threat to American interests since the end of the Cold War…Should the Democrats regain the White House in two weeks' time it is hard to imagine anything but more of the same misery.” 1/
“That's why those who decry Trump's 'divisiveness' should think again, at least when it comes to the global stage, and recognize that his capacity to split opinion could play to the advantage of the US. The mere prospect of a Trump victory is already making a difference.” 2/
“Yet, whoever becomes president, it will be China that remains the overwhelming concern…China now has access to all the oil, gas and metals it needs to satisfy Xi's galloping geopolitical ambitions, which include an attempt to force a new world order.” 3/
“A very significant difference between @VP and @realDonaldTrump is Harris would like to subsidize Europeans not taking care of their own security. Trump wants Europe to step up big time to become a real ally of the U.S. and not just a dependent.” 1/
“Of course, we’re going to honor our NATO commitments. But I think it’s important that we recognize that NATO is not just a welfare client.” 2/
🎯
Both right and necessary, from @JDVance: “I think the American people have the right to know that Donald Trump rejected the John Kelly, the Mark Milley consensus that America should be the policeman of the world.” 3/
"A full-scale [European] land war in their own territory...may need to be fought without the full firepower of the US, the indispensable ally that ensured the region’s security through the Cold War and ever since." 1/
"Yet Trump’s provocative comments reflect a current of thinking that transcends Washington’s political divide and may prevail whoever wins the US presidential election in November: that European governments should build their own powerful militaries..." 2/
"instead of keeping defense budgets slim, safe in the knowledge that their Soviet-era mutual defense pact with America will protect them from invaders." 3/
A very helpful corrective to the tendentious, propagandistic history of NATO we are so often subjected to.
Marc Trachtenberg is one of the leading Cold War historians.
We should look at NATO with real historical understanding. Not agitprop. 1/ cato.org/policy-analysi…
“I also knew that threats of abandonment were often made during the Cold War period. What Trump had said was less anomalous than people seemed to think.” 2/
“Secretary of State Dean Acheson, for example, insisted that Article 5 did “not mean that the United States would automatically be at war if one of the other signatory nations were the victim of an armed attack. Under our Constitution,” he pointed out, “the Congress alone has the power to declare war.” 3/