.@EsperDoD - #NDS says priority is first China then Russia. Must shift away from low intensity conflict to preparing for high intensity. Rogue states are secondary. Terrorism enduring background problem. 🎯 1/ #MSC2020
Speech will focus on Pentagon’s top problem: China. 2/
Xi is leading China faster and farther in wrong direction including more aggressive military posture. Intl community must wake up to what China presents. 3/
PLA increasingly operating well beyond its borders including Europe. (My take: Next 10 years we’ll be taken aback how far flung PLA will operations will be. WestPac remains priority theater though.) 4/
Beijing’s military expansion must be Europe’s concern too. 5/
PRC seeks to militarily modernize by 2035 and dominate Asia from a position of global preeminence by 2049. 6/
US seeks open and fair competition with China not conflict. All China needs to do is respect the rules and treat other countries w fairness and respect. 7/
.@DeptofDefense is implementing #NDS. W 21 budget DOD will make biggest RDTE investment ever while divesting from ill suited legacy systems. Also investing in AI, space, and other high tech 👍 8/
Not asking partners to reject engagement w China but that they hold China to right standards and be realistic. Short term costs for long term benefits. 9/
.@EsperDoD gives clear, strong speech on China & strategic vision and first question from moderator is on Afghanistan and Iraq. Perfect example of why strategic prioritization is hard. Why doesn’t media ask about PLA or 5G? 🙄 10/
Second question by other moderator on Huawei and European reaction. 👍 11/
.@EsperDoD : Bipartisan consensus on Huawei took time in US. Will take time in Europe. But optimistic. But can’t afford to ignore the threat. 12/
Oh wait ANOTHER question on Afghanistan. Seriously? And then a follow up!!! 13/
In response to good question from @IlvesToomas about what’s alternative, @EsperDoD admits a good point. Working on it! 14/
#NATO should focus on security or continent. Alliance has hit 30s targets. My take: That’s exactly right. NATO should hold down the fort in Europe by denying RF fait accompli option in East. Don’t lose the bubble.) 15/
Great stuff from @EsperDoD. Polite but to the point. Focused. China first. Europe should do its part by backing Econ and political efforts to induce good Chinese behavior while ensuring NATO security. 👍
Also great point from @EsperDoD when asked what NATO should do in Asia. His answer: Basically nothing. Focus on Europe and your region. Exactly right. 🎯
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“German defence minister Boris Pistorius has criticised his government for approving less than a fifth of the budget increase he said was needed by Germany’s military, in stark remarks on the eve of a Nato summit in Washington.” 1/ on.ft.com/4cRzqSp
“I got a lot less than I asked for. That’s annoying for me because it means I can’t initiate certain things at the speed that . . . the threat level requires,” Pistorius said.” 2/
Indeed.
“All eyes are now on Germany and on what we are doing, considering we’re the biggest EU member state and make the largest military contribution in Europe . . . We have a certain responsibility and we will live up to it,” a senior government official said.” 3/
Don't take it from me. Excellent, sound piece @fstockman @nytimes.
"The US simply can’t do everything everywhere all at once, by itself. The future requires well-armed, capable allies. The indispensable nation has to be a bit less indispensable." 1/
Gen. Dwight Eisenhower, NATO’s first supreme allied commander Europe, felt strongly that his mission was to get Europeans “back on their military feet” — not for American troops to become the permanent bodyguard for Brussels and Berlin." 2/
"“If in 10 years, all American troops stationed in Europe for national defense purposes have not been returned to the United States,” Eisenhower wrote of NATO in 1951, “then this whole project will have failed.” 3/
President Trump is spot on to warn of the danger of World War III and the urgent need to prevent it in ways that protect our key interests.
This superb piece from @OAWestad @ForeignAffairs breathes the right spirit for how to do so.
We should want a decent peace. Not war. 1/
"Xi Jinping and the CCP leadership are convinced the U.S. main objective is to prevent China's rise no matter what. [Yet] China's own statements regarding its international ambitions are so bland as to be next to meaningless." 2/
"All current evidence points toward China making military plans to one day invade Taiwan, producing a war between China and the United States just as the Schlieffen Plan helped produce a war between Germany and Britain." 3/
These are the kind of people who we need to be heeding about our nation's security policy and decisions about war and peace. A very compelling and penetrating profile of a key group from @ianwardreports. 1/
Proud to call many of them my friends and to honor their and so many others' service on July 4th.
Americans - and our servicemen and women more than any - deserve better, wiser, and more judicious leadership like these leaders are pointing to.
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 2/
"Having witnessed the failures and lethal consequences of the U.S. wars firsthand, they have grown skeptical of the efficacy of U.S. military power, distrustful of leaders and weary of the US involved in conflicts that could cost additional dollars and American lives." 3/
It was really great to speak to @SohrabAhmari for this @NewStatesman article. I'm grateful to Sohrab for the engagement and the very fair assessment of my arguments, warts and all!
"For about a decade, Elbridge Colby has been making a single argument in and out of government: that America can’t afford Chinese hegemony in Asia. He has also been saying that this outcome is narrowly preventable, provided Washington renews its industrial base and stewards its existing military capabilities – rather than waste them on Europe and the Middle East." 2/
"Instead, Colby urges Europe’s major powers to devote their energies to their backyard, permitting America to preserve the balance of power in Asia. “You’re right there,” he says, addressing British leaders. “The UK is rightly worked up about Russia. So focus there, where you have the capacity to realistically make a difference, and it’s more plausible to motivate the UK population to do something.” 3/
See here in @FT. The United States must withhold key forces, not do nothing. Europe and the United States should work realistically to manage and address these vulnerabilities together. 2/
2) I do not think it is fair to say I "ridiculed" the comments there. The fact that I am engaging with places like Policy Exchange and many European outlets proves that I have deep respect and concern for the situation. I believe candor here are the best forms of allyship. 3/