1) Data reveals that US Media & leftist opinion in 1940s was as #antiHindu as today. In 1940s, Hindus-INC were villain; Today, Hindus-BJP are villian. See data:-
@anniegowen 4) 1946 Associated Press release @AP monkey-balancing direct-action & great calcutta killing published in washington star:-
Muslim league supporters described as mostly non violent types who did not molest police van. chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn8304546…
@anniegowen @AP 5) Suppressing facts abt CAA protest is not new. Facts abt direct-action were suppressed as well:-
Washington newspaper states Muslim League had a peaceful direct action plan( words like "direct action against hindus", "battle for pakistan" are suppressed) chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn8304546…
@anniegowen @AP 6) Today's #antiHindu slurs were originally leveled against Cong-Hindus:
In 1944, Washington Editorial uses slurs like "Hindus are nationalist", "Brahmin Oligarchy", "Nazi/Jap Sympathy", "Enemy of Sikhs & Oppressed Hindus" towards Cong-Hindus chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn8304546…
@anniegowen @AP 7) Western Media repeating false-charges against Hindus is not a new thing. Through out 1940s pakistan debate, Western media keeps repeating muslim league propaganda & Jinnah's words “Democracy is alien to hindus”.
@anniegowen @AP 8) Today's charges of Hindu Majoritarianism are not new:-
In 1944, Washington editorial attacks Mahatma Gandhi's plebiscite & democracy demand as Hostile Majoritarianism towards minorities, sikhs & oppressed hindus. chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn8304546…
@anniegowen @AP 9) #antiHindu "Conspiracy of Silence" & "Orchestrated Chorus" is not new. Western media did it in 1940s as well:-
Events about hindus getting killed are vague with identities hidden. In contrast, what hindu attackers did is exaggerated with gory details: chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn7800216…
@anniegowen @AP 10) Harold Laski (Fabian-Socialist & Chairmen Labor Party) attacks hindu orthodoxy, rumor mongering india & states "creation of moslem pakistan is a fantastic proposal". He is supportive to special rights of anglo-indians, xtians & sikhs in free india. chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn8304546…
@anniegowen @AP 11) Hindu Nationalist Congress:
In 1940s, Washington newspaper editor called Mahatma Gandhi a symbol of Hindu Nationalism of Congress & independence with no respect for minority opinion chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn8304546…
@anniegowen @AP 12) From Gandhi-Hindu-Nationalist to Modi-Hindu-Nationalist. It is hindus who are the target (not gandhi or modi or india):
In 1940s, Word "Hindu Nationalist" was standard prefix to describe Mahatma Gandhi. chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn8304546…
@anniegowen @AP 13) CAA coverage is west is similar to direct-action against hindus coverage:-
In 1944, Washington DC newspaper editorial opposes hindu minority voting in pakistan plebiscite & describes non-cooperation as seditious: chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn8304546…
14) Term "Hindu-Nationalist" was NOT invented by Savarkar in 1923. It was invented by western press around 1914. It was freely used for all Hindus (Socialist, Communist, Ghadar & all) who opposed colonial rule: chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/search/pages/r…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) @washingtonpost is using Dravidian Racist strategy of making wild anti-brahmin allegations:
a) Brahmins control Silicon-valley.
b) In USA, Brahmins use Tam-Bram pat (i.e. Pat candidates to check for sacred-thread) washingtonpost.com/technology/202…
2) Describing merit as caste-privilege (aka beneficiary of Tam-Bram Pat) is defining feature of Dravidian Racist ideology:-
WaPo alludes that 2 brahmins @satyanadella & @IndraNooyi's rose to top is due to caste-privilege.
3) Dravidian Racist ideology has no use of facts:- @washingtonpost repeats the word "cisco" 17 times. "Cisco lawsuit" is the centerpiece of article but article does reveal the fact that law-suit was tossed out by federal court.
1) Why is @Wikipedia biased & #antiHindu?
Ans: Wikipedia’s mission is to summarize "accepted knowledge" from “reliable source”. Inconvenient facts are not part of “accepted knowledge” or published by so-called “reliable source”.
2)Anyone can edit Wikipedia?
Ans: No. Wikipedia has 4 levels of bureaucracy: Administrators, Bureaucrats, Supreme Court & Stewards ABSS. ABSS promotes group think, in-group favoritism & hostility to inconvenient facts. Only ABSS approved opinion is allowed @Wikipedia
Q3. What is “accepted-knowledge” & “reliable-source” @Wikipedia?
Ans: ABSS decides who is reliable-source and what is accepted-knowledge. Wikipedia editor's decided that @anuragkashyap72 is "reliable source"; So, @TheJaggi & @SwarajyaMag are black-listed:
1) This tweet series exposes 16 cases of #antiHinduism at @TheEconomist. Articles provide disparaging description of Hinduism & Hindus. They are filled with false allegations which are repeated even after they are proven wrong beyond reasonable doubt.
2)@theeconomist Bitter Fruit, Aug 2008:
Article states “pilgrims see (Amarnath) as a phallic symbol of the god Shiva” but that is not true. Encyclopedias state that phallic representation of Shiva is western interpretation. Trying to pass off western belief as hindu is dishonest.
3) @theeconomist Bitter Fruit, Aug 2008:
Article on kashmir describes relatively peaceful hindu protester as “Militant” and aggressive muslim protester as “Protester”.