Alex Salmond has arrived at the High Court in Edinburgh for the first day of his trial
Court 3 is currently full of potential jurors, 15 of whom will be selected shortly for the Alex Salmond trial. Should be a fairly straightforward/swift process - forget what you saw on that programme about the OJ trial, Crown and defence won't be striking out swathes of jurors...
The media have been transplanted to a separate room with a video feed of the courtroom, which is also where we expect to be when complainers are giving evidence - court will be cleared of all but a handful of journalists for that evidence (which is a common move in these trials)
I might have jinxed it by saying this would be a fairly swift process. Apologies. Still awaiting Lady Dorrian and indeed Alex Salmond in court. Lawyers pursuing the time honoured tradition of standing about chatting
Alex Salmond has arrived in the court. His trial should be getting underway shortly.
Lady Dorrian has arrived and the case has called. Going to be a quick bit of legal debate before the jury is balloted.
Jury now being balloted. 15 names on bits of paper being picked out of a bowl...
The charges against Alex Salmond are now being read in full to the freshly-balloted jury
Details of the charges currently being read to the jury can be found here - Alex Salmond to stand trial on sex offence charges bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotla…
Jury informed that Alex Salmond is pleading not guilty, and has lodged special defences of consent on various charges and of alibi on another
Lady Dorrian tells the jury that they must judge the case “on the evidence and nothing else” - there will be short break now where they should ask themselves if they can be impartial, “unprejudiced and unbiased”, and judge the case fairly
To be clear jury aren’t being asked if they’re members of a political party or if they have affiliations of that sort - altho they were asked if they had “strong feelings of support or animosity” for the accused or the women named in the charges, or if they personally know them
We have a jury, and the unselected people whose names didn’t come out of the bowl are leaving the court. Trial proper about to get under way...
Lady Dorrian is briefing the jury, telling them they are “judges not detectives” and shouldn’t go doing their own investigations. They just return a true verdict according to the evidence, not anything they have heard about the accused in the past, and politics is “irrelevant”
Lady Dorrian tells the jury that the burden of proof rests on the Crown throughout proceedings. There are no opening speeches, and the Crown are going to get us started...jurors urged to “pay close attention to the evidence” and take notes for when they consider their verdict
Crown calls their first witness in the case - Woman H. Alex Salmond is accused of sexually assaulting her and attempting to rape her.
A screen has been put up in the courtroom so Woman H won’t see Alex Salmond in the dock - the jury can still see her. Court cleared of the public and most media in an adjoining room watching video feed.
Alex Prentice, leading for the Crown, has Woman H identify herself to the jury. She confirms she worked in politics, as a Scottish government official.
A very short initial sitting - court adjourns for lunch.
And we’re back - jury have reassembled and evidence from Woman H resumes.
Woman H says she has been at Bute House “many times”. There were dinners there “all the time”, and during indyref campaign this would see “high profile supporters of independence” attend so Alex Salmond could put a case to them about them publicly supporting independence.
Woman H says there was an occasion when she was working at Bute House when Alex Salmond touched her. She says this happened in a sitting room next to his study - jury now examining a floor plan of Bute House.
Woman H says “that period of my life was extremely stressful”, in the buildup to the independence referendum. “All I did was work, this was the campaign of a lifetime and the team put their heart and soul into it. It was your every waking breath.”
Woman H says she was doing a “wrap up” session late one night with Mr Salmond, when he was “half cut” after a dinner; he wanted to “crack open” a bottle of wine he had got, she thinks, from the Chinese ambassador, and drink “shots” of it.
Woman H says Mr Salmond wanted to take shots with their arms linked, as it was “good luck”; “It was uncomfortable, I was never comfortable in his private personal space so that felt awkward”. But “he was in a good mood, so that was something to be celebrated.”
Woman H says Alex Salmond was sitting on the floor, and wanted her to sit down with him. He then touched her “inappropriately”, she says. “He was putting his hand down my top and kissing my face and neck and touching my legs.”
“He was just groping me, basically,” says Woman H. “I didn’t ask for any of it to happen.” Did she consent? “I wasn’t asked”. She says Alex Salmond was “laughing”.
Woman H says “It was like I froze inside. I said you’re my boss, you shouldn’t be doing this, and he found it funny and thought it was a challenge.” “Looking back I wish I had got up or decked him one, but it was like I was paralysed.”
Woman H says she was “in shock”. “I knew something had happened and it wasn’t right, and I wanted to get out of there as fast as possible”.
Woman H says she didn’t tell anyone because she was “embarrassed” and felt she had somehow done something wrong - she didn’t want people to think she was “another one of his women”
Moving to second “incident”, Woman H says it was another work event at Bute House where there had been alcohol. A famous actor had been there and they were seeing how he could help “facilitate other people in his peer group” following him in backing independence.
Later that evening Woman H says she was alone at Bute House with Alex Salmond. She says she wanted to speak to him about how the previous encounter wasn’t ok as she had entered a “serious relationship” with someone else. “He was a little bit dismissive.”
Woman H says Alex Salmond came and sat next to her on the sofa. She says he seems to be “buoyed to action” from her saying she had a boyfriend, “like it was a challenge”. He sat by her and pulled her legs over his, she says. She felt “extra vulnerable” as she was wearing a skirt
Woman H says “I an internal kind of panic, like I had frozen”. “He started to try and kiss me and touch my upper body and I just wanted to get away. I was trying to explain to him why this was not ok. I was saying ‘Alex what are you doing, this is daft’.”
Woman H says she was trying to “manage the situation” as she often did with Alex Salmond’s moods; “I thought I could talk him out of it”, but he was laughing and “trying to make banter of it”.
Woman H says she got up and backed away, edging towards the door. “I started to feel at that point I was being chased”. She was trying to get to the door to get out, but “he put his arm out and leaned over me. He’s quite a big guy”.
Woman H says she felt Alex Salmond’s behaviour “had turned a bit and he was titillated by the situation”. She felt like she was trying to “wrestle” him off; “at this point I started to feel scared”. “He wouldn’t stop pursuing me, kissing me, touching me.”
Woman H says there was a “lull” and she ran upstairs to fetch her things. She says Alex Salmond “blocked my exit” from the upstairs room - “he didn’t want me to go. He had his arm over me again and was touching me and kissing me. He kept asking me to stay over.”
Woman H says she wanted to “get away and call someone” for help, but “I was so embarrassed, I felt humiliated and scared”. “I wish in hindsight I’d screamed or kicked him in the nuts but I was just so frozen.”
Woman H says she was “scared of making him angry”; she thought she could say she would stay over in another bedroom, which she thought had a lock, and get Alex Salmond to go upstairs to his own bed. This was “a bit of an escape plan”.
Woman H says she thought she was making progress; Mr Salmond “stepped back” away from her, but he then followed her to the bedroom saying he was sorry and that he just wanted to talk. She says he had brought a bottle of wine from downstairs and wanted to have a drink with her.
Woman H says “he talked to me for a second, then he just full on pounced. He was physically all over me, he was taking me clothes off. It happened so fast.” She was trying to “duck” and “swerve” him - she didn’t want any of this to happen.
Woman H: “I was telling him to stop the whole time. He was taking his clothes off and I didn’t want any of that to happen. I wanted to keep my clothes on but it happened so quickly.”
Woman H says she was trying to put her clothes back on, but she looked up and Alex Salmond was standing over her naked. She says he was aroused, and he climbed onto the bed. She says she was trying to get away.
“I kept saying to him, what are you doing, stop,” says Woman H. “I tried to push him away.” “He was right there in my face”, pressing his body against her, she says. “I felt like I was being hunted.”
Woman H says she made “one final push” and managed to get Alex Salmond off her; she says she was saying “no, no, I’ve got a boyfriend, stop, you’re drunk”. She says he was muttering about her being “stupid”. “I didn’t want any of it to happen.”
Woman H says Alex Salmond fell asleep, and she curled herself into a ball hoping he wouldn’t wake up. She eventually got out into a bathroom next door. “I was in shock for a long time aferwards. I felt humiliated and embarrassed.”
Woman H says she felt like she wanted to “bury” the experience and not think about it. “He had other women and I didn’t want to be considered as that. I was scared of that.”
Court concludes for the day.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Philip Sim

Philip Sim Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BBCPhilipSim

2 Mar
ScotGov has released its external legal advice from the Salmond judicial review. It's basically set out as a timeline of documents; starting from 27 Sept, when counsel were satisfied that most grounds were "weak", but there was "real risk" over the ground of procedural unfairness
However advice changed quickly on 31 October, when the extent of contact between the investigating officer and complainers became clear; Roddy Dunlop QC said he was "very concerned indeed" and said this "presents a very real problem" - adding that IO may have been "not eligible"
Paper trail then jumps forward a month to 6 December, where Roddy Dunlop and Christine O’Neill say that “the ‘least worst’ option would be to concede the petition”. However emails from the following week say the Lord Advocate argued there was “no question” of dropping the case
Read 6 tweets
1 Feb
From independence strategy to trans rights, NEC factionalism to Alex Salmond, the SNP gives every impression of being a party threatening to tear itself apart on the eve of a crucial election.
People will point to the SNP still polling very strongly (and perhaps more to the point, opposition parties very poorly) but there’s an old saying about divided parties not being winners for good reason...and about there only being one poll that matters
In order to turn a majority in the polls into an *actual* majority - particularly in the Holyrood system, which actively discourages them - you need to turn out your base, to get those who say they’d vote for you to actually do it. Infighting *really* doesn’t help with that.
Read 6 tweets
21 Jan
The (virtual) Court of Session will be hearing arguments about whether or not Holyrood can legislate for indyref2 today and tomorrow - case brought by activists like @MartinJKeatings rather than ScotGov, but obvs the ruling could have interesting implications...
As is standard with the Court of Session I don't imagine there will *be* a ruling this week, but the judge says her "intention is to provide an opinion within days rather than weeks"
It's going really well so far anyway, with a row developing between the judge and the QC for the petitioners over the timetable for the hearings which appears to have ended with everyone being muted. So yes, the zoom courtroom has some similarities to your family zoom quiz
Read 8 tweets
19 Jan
Latest in the back and forth between Alex Salmond and the Holyrood inquiry committee - they're now asking if he can come in on February 2nd *at the very latest*. Have also offered 26 January - altho they've also invited Peter Murrell to give further evidence on one of those dates extract from letter
One minor detail I'd pick out from that letter is the note that committee members "unanimously" agreed to invite Mr Salmond to give evidence on 2 Feb. Perhaps a hint that things have not been entirely unanimous during their deliberations so far...
If they can't come to an agreement, *in theory* the inquiry committee could actually compel Alex Salmond to attend, although I imagine he would be able to produce a "reasonable excuse" what with the whole pandemic thing going on Image
Read 5 tweets
20 Dec 20
Figure a lot of people have a lot of questions right now so thought a quick thread signposting to where what info we have is might be helpful...
This is the current law on travel restrictions, in force now. It includes a legal ban on travel between Scotland and the rest of the UK, and in and out of council areas in levels three and four, without a “reasonable excuse” legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2020/344/s…
Again the cross-border travel laws are in force *now* - the plan was they would be relaxed for Christmas, the change is that they now will not. Travel *within* Scotland permitted on Christmas Day - but next day whole mainland goes into L4, which means no movement between councils
Read 10 tweets
13 Aug 20
MSPs will vote on a motion of no confidence in John Swinney as education secretary today. We already know it'll fail, because the Greens won't back it - so why are the opposition pressing ahead with it? [thread alert] bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotla…
While the outcome is obvs the immediately important thing for parents and pupils, politically the narrative is significant too, with an election looming - and ScotGov seem to have successfully seized control of it
Especially with focus now shifting to A-level results down south, with Scotland as a case study in a potential solution which pleases students rather than of the underlying problem, opposition parties can't afford to leave this as essentially a "John Swinney saves the day" story
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(