It can reproduce the trends that make the headlines, including that:
1) If unchecked the virus will spread exponentially
2) In the worst-case scenarios, the #COVID_19uk death toll in the could be in the hundreds of thousands,
3) The peak load on the healthcare system might not be reached for 2-3 months,
4) Widespread social distancing can help reduce the number of cases,
5) and social distancing limits the burden on a finite healthcare system,
6) While specifically isolating (and therefore protecting) the most vulnerable segments of the population can significantly reduce the overall mortality rate,
7) But slacking off on the social distancing could lead to a re-emergence of the virus.
8) This all underscores the need to stop the virus in its tracks as early as possible and prevent an epidemic, for example through app-based contact tracing as described by the Oxford Coronavirus Fraser group:
The model I used is a standard SIRD (or SEIR) (Susceptible-Infected-Recovered-Deceased) model, which treats different populations as states with transfer rates between them.
While revealing, this is still only an educational demo!
A similar, but more complete interactive model made by an actual epidemiologist can be found here
a) Policy people / the public, who want to know what fusion is and isn’t,
b) The fusion community, as we together need to better understand the context and likely competitive landscape our work will face.
2/
Despite a recent surge in activity, the timeline for fusion development is slow. And even once demonstrated, the tech doesn't lend itself well to a rapid rollout.
Fusion can likely only be significant after the world is already renewables-dominated.
People are still tweeting about the NYT's piece on the SPARC nuclear #fusionenergy release, so as a fusion PhD student I'm going to explain what it is and isn't...
Commonwealth Fusion Systems is a spin-out from MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Centre. A few years ago they described an innovative design for a power plant called ARC, which proposed using recent advances in high-temperature superconducting (HTS) magnets to shrink the machine.
This works because the fusion plasma is held by the strong magnetic field, as each charged particle corkscrews tightly around the field lines.
The higher the field (denoted B), the tighter the corkscrew, effectively shrinking the whole plasma.
As he (and the other academics at Oxford who worked on this) argues then only offsets with certain, very stringent conditions can be relied upon to reduce future warming.
Very few currently available offsets are geologically-permanent, for example.
For starters, credit to @BCG for making the pledge at all – it’s already more than @McKinsey and @BainAlerts have done (two of their main competitors), from what I can tell.
@BCG are talking about net-zero by 2030. That's not bad - well before the IPCC's 2050 date, and therefore in line with keeping to 1.5C of global warming.
The Climate and Ecological Emergency Bill is a piece of work to be proud of, whose championing shows that @XRebellionUK can continue making a difference.
In particular we look at the most pernicious example of doomism within a movement @GalenHall4 and I are members of: the damaging effect of Jem Bendell’s @deepadaptation agenda on @ExtinctionR .
2/
The original Deep Adaptation paper has been downloaded 100’s of thousands of times, and Bendell contributed a chapter to the Extinction Rebellion handbook, and has spoken for the movement many other times.