Some facts about the trial:
-The DA to investigate the original accuser's claims found them so inconsistent and contradiction-laden, they dismissed them out of hand.
-Another man runs against that DA on a platform of 'getting Cosby'. He loses. But becomes judge in Cosby's trial!
-The DA to investigate the original accuser's claims found them so inconsistent and contradiction-laden, they dismissed them out of hand.
-Another man runs against that DA on a platform of 'getting Cosby'. He loses. But becomes judge in Cosby's trial!
-A friend of the judge then runs for DA, and uses Bill Cosby IN CAMPAIGN ADS (hello, tainted Jury pool!) in order to win! He then prosecutes Bill Cosby.
No conflict of interest here!
No conflict of interest here!
-Because the first DA told Cosby the case was incredulous, Cosby was NOT GIVEN FIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE against self-incrimination during his civil deposition.
His deposition - arguably the most damning evidence against him - was ILLEGALLY ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE ANYWAYS!
His deposition - arguably the most damning evidence against him - was ILLEGALLY ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE ANYWAYS!
-The accusers were represented by Gloria Allred, infamous for trotting out false victims in extortion attempts. She did the same in 1993 with Michael Jackson, who defeated those accusations (ironically, thanks to 1108 evidence) in 2005.
-Becky James, a renowned Legal Appeals specialist, went on record as saying she had "never seen as many valid appellate issues for a defendant in a single case", from the tainted jury to the illegally obtained evidence and political motives of the prosecutor.
-Cosby was so committed to his innocence, he refused to even accept a plea deal to a misdemeanor. A fact NEVER referenced in mainstream media, amongst (false) reports that he 'joked' about committing the alleged crimes.
-Janice Dickinson, as I mentioned, not only admitted to fabricating her accusations... this is noteworthy, because - as the most notable celebrity accuser - her accusations precipitated the Cosby dogpile.
Prior to Dickinson's accusations? There were 2 accusers. Now there are 60.
Prior to Dickinson's accusations? There were 2 accusers. Now there are 60.
So we have:
Accuser 1: Investigated and found not to be credible by the previous D.A.
Accuser 2: Glommed on to accuser #1, and therefore must be regarded as suspect, given that the accusations were dismissed.
And Accuser 3: Addmitted to LYING ON THE WITNESS STAND!
Accuser 1: Investigated and found not to be credible by the previous D.A.
Accuser 2: Glommed on to accuser #1, and therefore must be regarded as suspect, given that the accusations were dismissed.
And Accuser 3: Addmitted to LYING ON THE WITNESS STAND!
And you think - because 57 women jumped on the money train after a CELEBRITY made a KNOWINGLY FALSE ACCUSATION against Cosby, and admitted it under oath... this make the case... MORE credible?
Oh, did I mention the prior D.A. testified in the Cosby trial, saying Bill Cosby was not given 5th Amendment Privilege and therefore a Mistrial should be declared... and was deemed NOT a credible witness by the judge, whom he'd previously defeated?
WHAT political motive?
WHAT political motive?
-The case was also not filed in time. Because of this, accuser testimony should have been thrown out. The Judge (who has NO political motive, as we've established) refused to even hold an evidenciary hearing. And so virtually any accuser was fair game. No investigation necessary.
-Additionally, the wife of the trial judge (who, we've already noted, ran against the previous DA on a platform of 'getting Cosby') contributed money to a #MeToo affiliate that planned a protest outside the courthouse during Cosby's trial.
-Lest you believe the Jury may not have been tainted, as previously suggested: A Juror who left the trial later testified that one of their fellow Jurors said 'Cosby is guilty' before the trial even started and 'we won't deliberate long'.
The Judge refused to remove that juror.
The Judge refused to remove that juror.
