theguardian.com/us-news/2020/a…
April 14: Washington Post reports the virus may have originated in a lab
archive.is/OIguS
Some stories are hard to discuss because they depend entirely on distribution to be taken seriously.
When an individual says it, it's a fringe theory. When the Washington Post reports it, we always suspected that!
That said, this paper was around since Feb 15:
img-prod.tgcom24.mediaset.it/images/2020/02…
Here's a list:
researchgate.net/scientific-con…
See also:
nature.com/articles/nm.39…
This is the kind of calm, rational discussion we need:
If it actually was a lab accident, some nations may seek reparations from China.
Others may instead align with China to get early access to vaccines, masks.
See also:
theglobeandmail.com/opinion/articl…
May polarize the world into US/India and Belt & Road camps.
This preprint from Current Biology has a detailed analysis that supports closer homology of the SARS-COV-2 virus to pangolin rather than bat-derived sequences.
cell.com/pb-assets/jour…
- Escaped-from-lab vs bioweapon are distinct theories
- Naturally pathogenic vs gain-of-function also distinct
- Fine-grained distinctions between these theories weren't made (archive.is/wip/GqUm1)
- Yet the discussion really *is* dangerous