My Authors
Read all threads
April 13: Guardian says the hypothesis that the virus may have originated in a lab is a conspiracy theory
theguardian.com/us-news/2020/a…

April 14: Washington Post reports the virus may have originated in a lab
archive.is/OIguS
The distribution-based community

Some stories are hard to discuss because they depend entirely on distribution to be taken seriously.

When an individual says it, it's a fringe theory. When the Washington Post reports it, we always suspected that!
To be clear, this was a courageous story with original reporting by @joshrogin and (if it holds up) should win all the awards! State Dept cables add confidence among people who need institutional signoff.

That said, this paper was around since Feb 15:
img-prod.tgcom24.mediaset.it/images/2020/02…
Personally, I'm against conflict. I think the one good thing that could come out of this line of thinking is to read all of Zhengli Shi's papers on coronaviruses, and those of her coauthors.

Here's a list:
researchgate.net/scientific-con…

See also:
nature.com/articles/nm.39…
You should also read @trvrb's thread from Feb 20 which goes through some of the molecular phylogenetic evidence FOR zoonosis & AGAINST escape from a lab.

This is the kind of calm, rational discussion we need:
This is not purely a scientific question. It's a geopolitical question.

If it actually was a lab accident, some nations may seek reparations from China.

Others may instead align with China to get early access to vaccines, masks.

See also:
theglobeandmail.com/opinion/articl…
Very complex topic. Most think it's zoonotic. Even if it *was* a lab accident, blaming China could be a great way to get your country to the bottom of the list for drugs, vaccines, masks if they are the world leader.

May polarize the world into US/India and Belt & Road camps.
One important neutral source of data that we have is multiple alignments of viral sequences.

This preprint from Current Biology has a detailed analysis that supports closer homology of the SARS-COV-2 virus to pangolin rather than bat-derived sequences.

cell.com/pb-assets/jour…
All these statements can be true:

- Escaped-from-lab vs bioweapon are distinct theories
- Naturally pathogenic vs gain-of-function also distinct
- Fine-grained distinctions between these theories weren't made (archive.is/wip/GqUm1)
- Yet the discussion really *is* dangerous
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Balaji S. Srinivasan

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!