It highlights the tiny margin for error in lifting lockdown: it's very easy to push R back over 1 and see the virus get out of control.
institute.global/sites/default/…
- mass testing (on a truly massive scale)
- Contact tracing using apps
- Mandating mask use
- opening schools
- geographic, age and sector segmentation
- shielding of the most vulnerable population
For example, if gradual relaxation of lockdown conditions enables businesses to regain 50%-80% of their old custom, who's going to make up the difference (many won't survive long-term with such diminished numbers.)
It is not mean to be prescriptive. It is not ordering a particular course of action.
Personally, I'm grateful for the effort that went into it.