James Bejon 🇮🇱 Profile picture
Apr 25, 2020 23 tweets 6 min read Read on X
MINI-THREAD: #Biblical #Chronology, the #Seder #Olam, and the #LXX.

TITLE: Too long in #Lockdown.

SUB-TITLE: ...although at least I now have multiple ways to calculate how long I’ve been here...
I’m presently working my way through the Seder Olam--a 2nd cent. AD (or so I’m told) Rabbinic text which deals with the chronology of Scripture.

I highly recommend it.

Below is an interesting phenomen I’ve observed.
The author (Rabbi Yose) likes to ‘back out’ (i.e., infer) absent numbers from long-term measurements of time.

Or at least that’s how it looks to me.
For instance, R. Yose arrives at a figure of 28 years for the reign/judgeship of Joshua,

but doesn’t tell us how he arrives at it.

As best as I can tell, Yose’s logic is as follows.
Premise 1: Year statements at the end of episodes in Judges state the overall length of those episodes.
For instance, at the end of Judges 3, the phrase ותשקט הארץ שמונים שנה = (trad.) ‘and the land had rest for 80 years’...

...means, ותשקט הארץ. בסך הכל היו שמונים שנה = ‘and the land had rest. In total, there were 80 years’.
(I’m not sure how that would be written in classical Hebrew. Maybe ראש שנה שמונים? Suggestions welcome.)
Hence, for instance, R. Yose writes, ‘After (Othniel’s rest), Ehud ben Gera had 80 years. To be excluded from them are the years in which he was in servitude (to) Eglon, the king of Moab: 18 years’: Image
Yose applies the same logic elsewhere. (‘Subtract from them...8 years!’) Image
All well and good (one might say).

Premise 2: Measurements of time are to be understood literally and exactly.
Specifically, if Jephthah says the Israelites have inhabited Canaan for 300 years (when he speaks to the Ammonites), then the Israelites must have inhabited Canaan for exactly 300 years at that time.

(I’m sure someone once told me #literalism was a modern notion.)
Premise 3: When the book of Judges lists a series of judges, their judgeships can be assumed to share a year in common, which should be subtracted from long-run year-counts. See below for an example: Image
Conclusion: Joshua must have reigned for 28 years since...

...Othniel’s 40 years + Ehud’s 80 + Deborah’s 40 + Midian’s 7 + Gideon’s 40 + Abimelech’s 3 + Tola’s 23 + Jair’s 22 - 1 year shared in common by Tola and Jair + the Ammonites’ 18 years...
...comes to a total of 272 years,

in which case Joshua must have judged Israel for 28 years.

Fine (one might say).

In light of R. Yose’s (apparent) logic, a number of questions arise.
First: if, as I’m often told, round numbers aren’t viewed as exact measurements in ancient ‘Jewish thought’ (?)--e.g., if ‘forty years’ = ‘a long time’, ‘eighty years’ = ‘a longer time’, etc.--, then why does R. Yose expect series of numbers to add up?
And why does he think absent numbers can be inferred on the basis of such arithmetic?
Second: might certain chronological calculations in the NT employ a similar logic?

Paul says ‘about 450 years’ passed between the entrance into Canaan and the rise of ‘Samuel the prophet’ (Acts 13.20).
Paul’s statement has caused chronologers a lot of headaches.

And chronologers have enough headaches as it is, so it would be nice if some of them could be removed.

So here’s a potentially helpful suggestion.
Maybe Paul has calculated his 450 years in a similar way to Rabbi Yose, but has interpreted the ‘end of episode’ statements in Judges differently.

The year totals listed in the book of Judges come to a total of 410 years.

See, for instance, Chisholm’s paper: Image
And Eli’s judgeship lasts for 40 years (1 Sam. 4).

Maybe, therefore, Paul gets from the entrance to Canaan to the rise of Samuel in 450 years simply by adding together all the intervals mentioned in Judges plus Eli’s judgeship.
Of course, Paul would have known there would have been gaps between some of the intervals he’d added up (and overlaps between others).

But he could still have added them up to obtain a total which was ‘about’ right.
Third, Eugene Merrill has written a paper on Paul’s reference to 450 years.

If, in these days of increased availability, it’s available somewhere, could someone please let me know?

THE END.
P.S. Oops, didn’t get round to the #LXX stuff. Maybe next time.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Bejon 🇮🇱

James Bejon 🇮🇱 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JamesBejon

Oct 10
THREAD: Daniel, Fun with Numbers, & Podcasts

Daniel is a man with a keen interest in names & numbers, so the number of times he uses certain names is significant.

He connects Babylon’s rulers with the number four, and Israel’s nobility with the number five, as shown below, Image
…which is no coincidence.

For Daniel, the future of the Gentile world can be summed up in the reigns of four distinct kingdoms, in which Babylon’s rulers are bound up.

And these kingdoms, Daniel says, will ultimately be replaced by a fifth kingdom—a heavenly kingdom—,…
in whose victory Daniel and his people will participate and rejoice.
Read 16 tweets
Aug 18
THREAD: Theology in Syntax (🧵)

Ephesians 1.3–10 is a majestic statement. It opens in the heavenly realms, before the foundation of the world, and concludes in the fulness of time, with all things in heaven and earth united in Christ—a grand sweep of divine history. Image
It is an awesome and extraordinary declaration of God’s plans. And its syntax matches its message.
Scattered throughout its sweep of history are references to what God has done for us—“blessed us”, “chosen us”, “predestined us”, etc.

Just as we find ourselves caught up in the syntax of Ephesian 1, so we find ourselves caught up in God’s plans.
Read 10 tweets
Jul 20
THREAD: Job 28—A Journey into the Mines

The text of Job 28 is a beautiful composition. It reveals important truths about the nature of wisdom and at the same time paints an exquisite picture of the book of Job’s central theme. Image
For a brief intro to the book, see below:

Back in chapter 13, Job made an important statement. “If you would only be silent for a while”, he told his friends, “it would result in your wisdom” (Job 13.5).

Well, here in chapter 28, that statement takes on a prophetic character.
Read 29 tweets
Jul 19
THREAD: Job the Righteous Sufferer

The Biblical narrative contains numerous examples of ‘righteous sufferers’—men who suffer not as a result of their own sin, but because of and to some extent *for* the benefit of others.

Joseph, Moses, Elijah, Jeremiah—the list goes on. Image
The most dramatic OT example of a righteous sufferer, however, is surely Job.
— Job was not merely a good man; he was the most blameless and upright man on earth (Job 1.8).

— Job was not merely a rich man; he was the richest man in the east (1.3).

— And Job did not merely come upon hard times; he lost *everything* (aside from his integrity),…
Read 24 tweets
May 17
THREAD: The Trinity in Creation

Scripture opens with an account of a triune God who creates the heavens and earth over the course of a seven-day week.

What’s the connection between these numbers? Could a triune God have created the world over any period of time he chose? Image
No doubt he could. But a sevenfold week seems particularly apt. Here’s why.
Given three conceptual entities, seven sets naturally emerge, or eight if we include the empty set. Image
Read 17 tweets
Apr 18
<SCARLET THREAD>
Blood in the Biblical Narrative

As Christians, it’s natural for us to associate bloodshed with redemption. In light of the Gospel, the idea seems intuitive.

That bloodshed can bring about redemption, however, is an unusual idea,… Image
…which is revealed to us *gradually* as the Biblical narrative unfolds.
Blood is first mentioned in Scripture in the story of Cain and Abel, where (as we’d expect) it’s connected with judgment.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(