FYI: if you’re fiercely for OR against Biden, you won't like parts of this THREAD!
1. Stories, corroboration
2. Credibility
3. Political motive
4. Past false claims
5. Biden’s patterns
soundcloud.com/katie-halper/j…
2019 claim from Medium article in which she first claimed harassment by Biden:
medium.com/@AlexandraTara…
Pic 2 from Nevada Union article:
theunion.com/news/nevada-co…
Pic 3 from Washington Post (“WaPo 1”):
washingtonpost.com/politics/forme…
LA Times article from June 2008 on veepstakes (Biden gets his own paragraph):
latimes.com/archives/la-xp…
salon.com/2020/03/31/a-w…
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EWx2_2_WoAA2KoE.png)
snopes.com/fact-check/cnn…
businessinsider.com/former-neighbo…
businessinsider.com/joe-biden-alle…
1. Stories: some inconsistencies not necessarily contradictory, some are; corroboration of “touching” story in mid-90s, assault story less clear
2. Credibility: contemporaneous Biden/Putin pivot (possible leverage?), dishonesty on Putin (pattern of dishonesty?)
4. Her assault story fits several patterns of false claims.
5. “Touching” story fits Biden’s pattern, assault claim does not
romansresearch.wordpress.com/2020/04/30/tar…