The simple solution: disbarment.
Having made the decision to recuse, a judge risks disbarment when his decision is amended with NO LEGITIMATE BASIS AT ALL except—I *believe* the in-discipline phrasing for the judge's attitude would be—"screw everyone."
Disbar this m*therfucker.
Having made the decision to recuse, a judge risks disbarment when his decision is amended with NO LEGITIMATE BASIS AT ALL except—I *believe* the in-discipline phrasing for the judge's attitude would be—"screw everyone."
Disbar this m*therfucker.
PS/ I'm sorry, but if there's one thing I take *extremely* seriously, it's professional ethics. Especially judicial ethics. Every attorney in Wisconsin should militate for the disbarment of this man. He shames our profession and likely needs to be investigated now for corruption.
PS2/ This would be a *really* good time for journalists in Wisconsin to file to see all Daniel Kelly's government emails—as the chance he hasn't communicated with someone from the Republican Party about the necessity of him sitting on this case to help Trump win in 2020 is *low*.
