@EST2PST @KimStrassel It's within the realm of possibility. Has happened in other cases, such as Miranda. It isn't established that he lied at interview, by the way. The FD-302 report was mishandled. Interview in January. Date of FD-302 in August. They played with it. The FD-302 is meant....
@EST2PST @KimStrassel ...to be a narrative version of what the person interviewed actually said. When you have a seasoned agent like Strzok, and a SUPERVISORY Special Agent at interview, there is little need to take 7 or 8 months to produce the final version of the report. The agents take notes...
@EST2PST @KimStrassel ...during the interview, write up the narrative-type report of exactly what the subject/witness said at interview, and that is the report. It is not a "Deliberative Document." It is supposed to be comprised of facts set forth by the subject/witness. If something is...
@EST2PST @KimStrassel ...found to be questionable about the testimony (an FD-302 is TESTIMONIAL EVIDENCE) is discovered later, another interview is sought, and another FD-302 is produced.
archive.org/stream/FbiManu…
archive.org/stream/FbiManu…
@EST2PST @KimStrassel So, you have this report that took 7-8 months to produce, which is supposed to take only about one week, and you have documents in which it is discussed if they are supposed to get Flynn to lie.
That is not what FBI agents are supposed to do at interviews.
That is not what FBI agents are supposed to do at interviews.
