My god what is this explicit effort to deracialize racial profiling, @StreetsblogUSA? Pedestrians are not being overpoliced during COVID-19. Police are using COVID-19 as yet another excuse to harass folks of color, particularly Black people. usa.streetsblog.org/2020/05/06/don…
I literally feel sick to be attached to the national Streetsblog network lately. But I'm going to try to push the bile back down and explain why this is so insidious - how it perpetuates structural harms and centers whiteness in planning in the guise of allyship.
First, framing policing as something that inconveniences and hinders *all* peds, and, on occasion, PoC peds in slightly more annoying ways, is a form of #AllLivesMatter.
It denies the way policing and the criminal justice system have explicitly been structured and deployed to monitor, constrain, and criminalize the behavior and movement of Black and brown people.
[Just realizing the better thing to do would have been to write all this out first before embarking on a rage thread so bear with me... this might be a little slow coming together]
Doing so makes it possible, for ex, to frame police who are not wearing masks (or wearing them improperly) punching youth of color in the face as some sort of weird anomaly tied to asking police to engage folks on public health.
"seemingly" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here
"Who amongst us could have predicted that mask usage and social distancing would be selectively enforced?"
Though two videos of graphic police violence are included, they are immediately deracialized and blamed on the vector of oppressive health policy, which apparently resulted in a Black doctor being cuffed instead of educated about distancing... [I'm sorry what?]
That doctor was in front of his own home and was accused of dumping trash on his own lawn - the packaging of the supplies he was about to take to the unhoused community as part of his effort to do outreach and testing. nytimes.com/2020/04/14/us/…
In the next paragraph, an attempt is made to figure out how these discrete, not systemic, incidents fit into a livability framework by labeling them as part of larger slate of "pedestrian 'crimes'" that oppress white people, too.
This flattening of the barriers to access to the public space people of color face speaks to the major chasm that exists between livability advocates and urbanists of privilege and BIPoC advocates and those who use a justice lens... Namely: la.streetsblog.org/2016/09/28/equ…
[Quoting myself is incredibly douchey but writing about this very specific clash between frameworks in urban planning might be one of the nichier niches ever to niche, so...]
Where do you anchor your frameworks and narratives? On the bicycle (or pedestrian, in this case)?
...which allows you to think of bicycles (and sidewalks and public space) as great equalizers and our shared impediment as cars and a lack of bike lanes...
Or on the body on that bicycle/walking down the street and all of the vectors of oppression imposed upon it?
Depending on where you anchor your frame, you are going to have an entirely different set of understandings of and prescriptions for how to make streets and sidewalks and cities more open, just, and welcoming for all.
What it definitely would not lead you to do is keep deracializing distancing issues being leveraged to brutalize PoC by suggesting that if more health outreach had been done in Black/brown communities they wouldn't be so sick & this could have been prevented. [I'm sorry, what?]
I feel like all I've done is rant lately. Those unlucky enough to be my followers saw me touch on many of these issues in a lengthy thread yesterday - similarly born from frustration with our national network's (and urbanism mor broadly) myopia.
And I will still not link to this horsetrash piece that deliberately distorts what the BIPoC advocates, members of the Untokening, and those trying to be allies to marginalized groups have been trying to say around #openstreets. Just know it is horsetrash.
I have been so fortunate to spend the last 8+ years at @StreetsblogLA. It hasn't always been easy but I am proud of how we have grown and continue to grow in our capacity to center equity in our work. [I realize they might want to disown me now, tho, so...]
But I'm deeply concerned by how much more white-centered the lens has become over the past couple of years and how much I am not heard nationally, despite repeated empty assurances to the contrary.
In this moment - of all moments - it is imperative that those who think about cities have the capacity to build new paradigms that center the needs of those that have been deliberately left behind.
But we cannot afford for our cities to emerge from quarantine less intact, less inclusive, less resilient, or less just. And I'll be damned if I will let my own network participate in keeping us from that goal.
Especially a national network that has perpetuated harm by ceaselessly (and cringe-worthily) beating the drum for #openstreets for the past two months while struggling with even a basic understanding of whom the streets have never been open for or why or how.
Love and peas.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This (re the 110) is a bit oversimplified. The 110 was constructed as the Black pop. was experiencing rapid growth in South LA (which was still largely white then) and was spilling beyond the borders of redlined zones. It was more about containment/division than displacement. 1/
Where the East LA interchange was actively about "slum clearance" the 110 S. route was contentious b/c it was going to run thru white neighborhoods wherever it was put. Kenneth Hahn & protesters tried to push it much farther east to no avail. newspapers.com/image/68933525…
But the original Figueroa Pkwy plans had it running through the middle of S. LA. And the 110 rte had the added benefit of running alongside redlined zones and containing the rapidly growing Black population to the Eastside.
The LAPPL claims CM Soto-Martinez called for patrols to watch over his Lexus, but even Fox's own story has been corrected to note the CM doesn't own a Lexus & that it was a staffer who made the call about their personal vehicle. But why should police let facts get in the way...?
What about the hypocrisy of targeting someone for a public smear campaign when the evidence indicates they are not the guilty party? Just asking for the public...
On 1/18, Feezy filed a $10M tort claim vs. LASD for the NYE incident where dep. Justin Sabatine put a gun in his face & threatened to blow a hole in his chest. Audio of the threats quickly went viral. But the Sheriff did not respond for nearly a week 🧵: la.streetsblog.org/2023/02/03/any…
When they finally did, the statement was underwhelming, categorizing the threats to Feezy’s life as “unprofessional language” & the displaying/drawing of a weapon. It didn't mention the intimidation Feezy faced at the station or answer any ??s I asked.
LASD also released body cam footage of the incident. Though the detention lasted half an hour, the cam footage is just 4 min long, and only from Sabatine’s camera, which he did not turn on until a min. into the encounter, in violation of LASD policy.
Now @kdeleon is just making sh*t up. He didn't suggest @mhdcd8 take LAX from CD11 to expand the Black middle class there. He didn't want assets taken from CD9 b/c it would likely result in KDL/CD14 losing assets.
Tavis Smiley: My point is that you're not in the room...you're not voting on the issues that matter to your constituents. So when you say that your constituents will be left w/out a voice if you aren't there... You ain't there now.
LAPD's statement that they turned off 🚨/sirens to indicate "they would no longer be attempting to stop the vehicle" as they approached the intersection doesn't make a lot of sense. Nobody being pursued thinks, "phew!" while 🚓 is just 50ft behind you. latimes.com/california/sto…
Sirens are as much a signal to the person being pursued as an indicator to other road users to stop/slow down/move right/get outta the way. This is the moment the signal was turned off. They're both speeding & the first vehicle is probably 3-4 car lengths from the intersection.
Captured on a dashcam as the vehicle being pursued and LAPD speed toward them. LAPD has just turned off their lights in this image.
Saying the car part carried by Petit resembled a "nonfunctioning firearm" was bad enough, but it wasn't the only troubling assertion LAPD made at the hastily called "town hall" on the shooting the other night. la.streetsblog.org/2022/07/29/lap…
To justify the shooting, LAPD is working to anchor the narrative about the threat Petit allegedly posed in the 911 call. To do so, they took the highly unusual step of embedding a partial transcript in their official statement on the shooting. lapdonline.org/newsroom/offic…
I say "partial" b/c LAPD has also said that the caller followed Petit for some distance. That transcript is not included here, likely b/c it would contradict the intention of the excerpt above, which is to suggest Petit was brandishing a weapon/engaged in threatening behavior.