Profile picture
, 5 tweets, 2 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
Tara Reade's claim abt Biden only works if she wasn't wearing pantyhose that day.
When asked by Katie Halper, Tara said she wasn't wearing pantyhose that day bcs it was too hot.
Then she saw we all noted that EVERY women esp on Capitol Hill wore pantyhose in 1993.

Oops.
1/4
Tara had a problem. She knew her "no pantyhose" claim was being discredited. Hard.
So she invented a brand new excuse for @megynkelly about why she wasn't wearing pantyhose just on that day. Her "crotchless panties for my boyfriend" excuse was born. 2/4
Tara did not tell this to Katie Halper, nor did any of her dubious confidents mention this detail. Not her brother. Not her ex. Not her neighbor. No one.

Is the "crotchless panty" detail included in the DC police report @ReadeAlexandra filed a few weeks ago? 3/4
Because filing a false police report is punishable with a huge fine and some time behind bars. 4/4
washingtonpost.com/archive/lifest…
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Cheri Jacobus

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CheriJacobus see all

Profile picture
Cheri Jacobus
@CheriJacobus
Tara Reade wants us to believe she was the ONLY woman in DC not wearing pantyhose in 1993, that there was a "semi-private" hallway on a day when Senate was in session, that a man who's been vetted since becoming a Senator at age 27 w/no history of recklessness was reckless. 1/3
That her constantly changing story is something we won't notice, her blog expressing love for Russia & Putin (with or without his shirt) and claims Mueller lied mean nothing, and that the fact she was charged with bank fraud 4 days before exiting Biden's office is meaningless 2/3
Tara even edited her own medium writings on Biden & the alleged incident after she posted them.
She made claims about what superiors told her in that office but doesn't name them. Weird.
I believe women should be heard.
Tara has been heard. Now she's vetted & caught lying3/3
Read 5 tweets
Profile picture
Cheri Jacobus
@CheriJacobus
1993 every woman on Capitol Hill wore pantyhose, even in summer recess. Tara claims she wasn't wearing any the day she was "assaulted" in a hallway in the Senate office complex because that's the only way her story "works". 1/2
Senate was in session or Biden wouldn't have been in DC. When Senate is in session every hallway is busy. There are no "semi-private" hallways, esp near the trains. But no pantyhose for Tara tho the rest of us wore them always, repairing runs w/nail polish. They came in eggs 2/2
To be clear, Tara Reade HAD to claim she was not wearing pantyhose when Biden allegedly "sexually assaulted" her, or her version of events would not make sense. In order for her story to "work" -- she had to say she was not wearing pantyhose at a time when 99% of women wore them
Read 3 tweets
Profile picture
Cheri Jacobus
@CheriJacobus
So weird how MAGAts & Berniacs are so willing to believe that a man who's squeaky clean in 50 years of public life would be so reckless as to sexually assault a woman in open public hallways of the Capitol & Senate complex. A man w/ no history of recklessness.
Biden has called for the Office of the Secretary of the Senate to open the records on the complaint Tara says she filed. Why this is not the lead item in each and every mention of Tara's ever-changing story is journalistic malpractice
Tara's every changing story and the fact her own brother recently "forgot" the alleged "digital penetration" part of the story and had to call back a reporter after being coached to changed the details. Years of thorough vetting and not a hint of anything about Biden
Read 5 tweets

Embed code for your website

×
Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!