This seems to a regular habit of AG Barr's nytimes.com/2020/05/10/opi… 
This oped by Mary McCord indirectly raises another curious issue about Barr's Flynn decision.
Flynn - theoretically - lied to VP Pence and other members of the administration, causing them in turn to make false statements to the public. 1/x
Flynn - theoretically - lied to VP Pence and other members of the administration, causing them in turn to make false statements to the public. 1/x
Flynn's false statements about his conversations with Ambassador Kislyak gave the Russians leverage over him. They could threaten to expose his lies, embarrass him. 2/x
Yet despite these supposed lies, and all the hazards to which they exposed Flynn and the Trump administration - the Trump administration then and now *was not angry at him.* Isn't that odd? 3/x
When people who have every reason to be furiously angered by a lie show themselves not angry at all ... it raises suspicions that maybe THEIR stories about what happened are not actually fully truthful either. END
