Here’s a thread on a specific example from Taiwan on why they’re a very good idea – particularly as some countries and states start re-opening.
It moved EARLY, w/expert-led epidemic control center set up in Jan. – *before* Wuhan even locked down. Contact tracing & effective quarantine policies of both infected & close contacts worked out in Feb. And so on..
Here, we’re on Day 28 of no new domestic cases. 440 cases total. Only 6 deaths. Schools & businesses have more or less just stayed open the whole time.
[Why Palau? Well, when you are a gov. with official diplomatic relations with only 15 nations…because of Beijing…you don't have many options.]
theguardian.com/world/2020/apr…
But it didn’t happen.
navytimes.com/news/your-navy…
[On Teddy Roosevelt, virus # => 1000+, then Navy stopped releasing info] politico.com/news/2020/05/0…
"A CECC official said that if healthy and infected people [who are interacting - i.e. talking] are wearing masks, their risk of viral transmission is reduced to about 1 to 2 percent."
taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/ar…
Just put those slogans on face masks – whatever your position is - and use them to assert your free speech rights in a highly public way.
Many other policies – such as vaccines & testing – require time, money, & organization. But masks are a relatively easy + effective tool that individuals & institutions can start adopting themselves.
And yet the TOTAL number of confirmed cases here is lower than San Marino (30,000 pop.) [in Europe] or Wyoming (580,000 pop.) [in U.S.]
Masks, masks, masks...