Remember that Chinese paper suggesting they had identified a much more ‘Aggressive’ COVID-19 strain. Well. They issued a retraction after a robust rebuttal from Glasgow Uni.
Somehow not getting the same attention
retractionwatch.com/2020/05/11/agg…
Somehow not getting the same attention
retractionwatch.com/2020/05/11/agg…
This is what Glasgow Uni said. 
This was the correction issued.
Changing “aggressive” to “high frequency”
Changing “aggressive” to “high frequency”
And this is also what Glasgow Uni had to say about the way the original researchers responded.
In other words. Be careful when you see “pre-print” or “not peer reviewed” especially in this sort of paper.
There’s a lot of half-cock stuff being churned out amidst some good stuff
In other words. Be careful when you see “pre-print” or “not peer reviewed” especially in this sort of paper.
There’s a lot of half-cock stuff being churned out amidst some good stuff
