The Red Pill, with respect to intersexual dynamics, is, and will always be a praxeology. It is unconcerned with value judgements. Issues of how one interprets the data presented by Red Pill praxeology as right or wrong is an exercise in subjectivity and personal belief.
In essence the Red Pill should always be about what IS – not what should be, not what seems moral, immoral or amoral. What one does with the data the Red Pill praxeology aggregates, and how one interprets that information, is up to the individual.
The prescriptions we create for ourselves with this knowledge are almost always a value call.
The real question for men, new to the Red Pill, is are they beginning from a position of value judgement first and then seeking to find the Red Pill data that best aligns with that preconception?
Or are they beginning from a neutral, objective position of interpreting this information and then forming well-thought, rational prescriptions for themselves based on that objectivity?
