.@AndrewCMcCarthy , Thank You. The reason I ask is a hunch FBI CR cuts (summary) was extent of the documentation. Not sure if there was 'full transcript' when FBI questioned Flynn. Ergo does use of FISA transcript as evidence against U.S. person require gaining more authority?
I have suspicion Susan Rice is requesting release of full transcript because she knows non-existent. [As used against Flynn] Which puts more distance between Obama WH and FBI Comey as rogue operation. Which was/is ongoing goal.
Apparently FBI would never use "tech cuts" in legal proceedings against U.S. person. The underlying fulsome transcript would be needed. Did that transcript ever surface? Was it created? Or was "CR Cuts" enough for FBI objective? 
Van Grack carefully worded response:
Remember... The underlying convo is completely appropriate, understandable and legal comments by Flynn to Kislyak: (per mueller report)
It appears there is no issue, no "there" there, in the underlying call content itself. [albeit transcript unseen]
There is only an issue of nuanced legality with how the FBI framed the responsive questioning by Flynn. [302 as highly edited]
There is only an issue of nuanced legality with how the FBI framed the responsive questioning by Flynn. [302 as highly edited]
First, they were not texts per se', they were instant messages. However, that aside..."and the email" (?)
What is this email?
What is this email?
The Feb 10, IM's
Just a hunch...
