Sarasvati is mentioned fifty times in the hymns of the Rig Veda alone!
Dharma Sutra and the Mahabharata. But that's a different type. Let's see what the "foren" researchers think as this is the only criteria of validity in India.
3. Dr. N. A. Godbole, Head of Technical Science branch of Banaras Hindu University conducted detailed and intense studies of Rigvedic Saraswati in 1963.
American satellite ‘Landsat’ has through its aerial photography revealed the dried bed of River Saraswati in its satellite maps.
Summary.
Link: tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
Link: kgpchronicle.iitkgp.ac.in/in-the-quest-f…
1. Decline of Harappan city Dholavira happened due to drying up of Saraswati. So how could Vedas describe Saraswati as a mighty river if they came hundreds of years later after IVC civilazation?
Research file: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.100…
Link: isro.gov.in/sites/default/…
Link: researchgate.net/publication/26…
Summary
Link: nature.com/articles/s4159…
Summary (pic)
1. River Saraswati existed and is NOT mythological
2. It dried up way before the established dates of AIT/AMT chronology (drying up from 2500 BC) so how could Rigveda in 1500 BC say it was a mighty river and Mahabharata in 1000 BC say it is drying?