"Dominic Cummings broke the rules." The rules say not to leave home if you have symptoms FOR ANY REASON. With exceptions ONLY if that's impossible. But at no point did he require childcare.
This is shown in every piece of polling that has been done. Including that of the pro-government Daily Mail.
Journalism.
Logical analysis of the previous sentence.
Analysis of polling. "lazy label of elite" is subjective but justified as polling suggests public thinks it of him.
Polling shows most people believe he broke the rules they followed. So it is logical to say that the government implying the rules were looser than they were, is telling people they got it wrong.
A government minister came out to completely undermine the Stay Home message as if it never existed. So again, @Maitlis is drawing the logical conclusion from that.
All just facts, backed up by polling data.
Not one listener would interpret "ignore" as literally sticking his fingers in his ears. By ignore, @Maitlis means in terms of his actions. Today, he urged the country to move on, even referring to it as a "political ding dong".
Does backing Cummings help the Tories? No. Polls show that.
Is it helping the UK get through Coronavirus? A government minister just denied Stay Home was a thing.
=Blind loyalty
The man broke the rules established by his government and all evidence suggests the public is furious.
TO PRETEND OTHERWISE WOULD BE FAKE NEWS!