As cities across America burn and the militarised police continue to incite riots against righteous protestors, kill innocents and attack journalists, we’re witnessing a release of frustration on both the implements and the symbols of Black suppression.
Protests; peaceful and pleading, angry and distraught, rage against the Police Order that has since it’s very inception been used to repress black skin. We now see it every day in heart-rending videos of murder and assault by civilian and cop alike.
Buildings have been burned to the ground, police stations as well as historic places enured with our slave holding past. As these frustrations play out on both implement and symbol, and as justice for those murdered seems far from coming,
the wider argument against the validity of these symbols used by police and a portion of White America needs to be addressed if there is to be any closure in the, hopefully near, future.
“It's only a bit of cloth, it's only a statue, it's our history that needs to be preserved." No. These are not symbols of a proud heritage. These are symbols of oppression and if people don’t believe that then they are walking through life with their eyes closed.
The overwhelming majority of these statues that are being pulled down were not erected immediately after the civil war. Why? In the few years of in the immediate aftermath of the war, the South had changed, if incrementally.
Black men could vote, could hold office, could shape their own lives and the lives of their community for the first time. The South couldn’t and didn't erect these abominations at that time because Reconstruction had finally given voice to those who were held in bondage, those
who worked from birth to death, those who were beaten, those who were raped and killed and treated like the livestock they were believed to be. No, these statues were erected once the South had finally removed the ‘Yankee interlopers' from their soil and enacted Jim Crow,
allowing the white establishment to reclaim what they believed to be theirs. These statues were erected to be symbols of a glorious past and the fallen “heroes” of a cause never given up. They were erected to be a celebration of men who had their Southern future taken from them.
No, these statues were erected once the South had finally removed the ‘Yankee interlopers' from their soil and enacted Jim Crow, allowing the white establishment to reclaim what they believed to be theirs. These statues were erected to be symbols of a glorious past.
But most importantly, and most insidiously, they were erected to be a reminder to every person, black and white, of who was in charge.
And every black child, from the moment of each statue’s erection, had to go through their entire lives with these white men, these men who fought so hard to keep them as slaves, staring down at them. A white man on a horse who kept your grandparents as chattel for generations.
A nameless soldier who gave his life to deny a free life to others. And children still have to make these walks, every day. But let’s celebrate these men for the rest of time?
What history do we preserve with these statues? Should these men be honoured for their military service only obtained through treason or honoured for being avid believers in the deficiency of the black man, in segregation.
Because they are not symbols of shame. They are symbols of pride. They will never be symbols of shame to those who want to and need to continually glorify them.
Should we honour the thousands and thousands of men who fought to preserve slavery and all of it’s byproducts? Why allow statues that honour these morally decrepit fools? If the reason to leave them is as a cautionary tale, then this a fallacy and wholly disingenuous. Why?
Because they are not symbols of shame. They are symbols of pride. They will never be symbols of shame to those who want to and need to continually glorify them. Where are all the glorious memorials to Hitler and Rommel and Goebbels and Goering?
Come to Ireland and show me all the beautiful statues of Cromwell. These memorials are not here because they are not appropriate. It's not necessary to place Hitler next to a Holocaust memorial.
Just as any number of statues honouring Confederate slave owners are not appropriate. It's not enough to leave them with the caveat, "they weren’t the best of men.” This is not enough.
A statue of a man who was a racist is not a benign thing, it is a symbol of racism. A flag of a country created to preserve the enslavement of black men and women is not a piece of cloth, it is a symbol of racism.
It makes an INCREDIBLE difference to CHOOSE to remember those who were oppressed rather than those who did the whipping. A memorial to slavery next to the slave holder is insulting to the generations of who have come after, still fighting for a full freedom never won.
Preserve history? What history do we need to preserve here? Do you think the free and righteous thinking world will ever forget the name Adolf Hitler? Do you think that America will ever forget slavery or the Civil War?
History will record those who made a difference, but what need is there to remember the little men who fought a war -who literally killed- in order to keep others enslaved? If their influence on American society was so great, so beneficial,
why do their statues glorify their treason and the basest failures of their human spirit instead of the improvements they made to their nation after their pardons?
There is no justification for the continuance of statues or symbols honouring the Confederate spirit - because it is morally bankrupt and rotten. These are not American heroes, they were traitors to their country. And every single “it wasn’t just about slavery” line that you’ll
ever hear is peddling a lie. Because, ultimately, every single factor that led to the U.S. Civil War came down to the institution of slavery. It came down to one people clinging on to their “right” to preserve a society which enslaved others. They were not American heroes.
There is a question that I’m seeing a lot lately; what can I do, as a white person, to help end racism? It’s a difficult question to answer, even more so when you’re 3500 miles away from your country as it ignites and you can’t physically be there to lend your hand, body, voice.
It’s not always enough to just feel like things are wrong, to even say that things or wrong or to join in the platitudes. We must ally ourselves to something tangible. To something achievable. Fight for the active removal of racist symbolism in our society as a recognition of our
past as well as an act of reconciliation. Ban the Confederate battle flag, just as Germany banned Nazi symbolism. Remove statues glorifying Confederate soldiers from the neighbourhoods and cities where they stand as a festering reminder of the rotten concept of supremacy,
either for scrap or to use as educational material in a more appropriate location. We need to educate ourselves better. Read @norahannahjones #1619Project with an open mind, read James Baldwin, James Weldon Johnson, Toni Morrison, Langston Hughes,
Garnette Cadogan’s “Walking While Black” -any Black author who can give us a glimpse into the Black American experience and how our institutions reinforce their everyday generational struggle.
Fight for not just the reformation of the Police Order, but the complete reconstitution of it by defunding, reducing numbers, reinstituting educational qualifications, re-application and by the complete confiscation of any military grade tech or equipment designed to wage war.
We're witnessing a white supremacist leadership engaging in exactly the kind of leadership we should expect from a white supremacist leadership. This is a chaos and a division that they hope will suit their aims. It has been a tactic long used, but maybe never so blatantly.
We cannot let our Black brothers and sisters down anymore, we cannot let our First Nation brothers and sisters down anymore, we cannot let our women down anymore, we cannot let our disenfranchised and vulnerable down anymore with apathy and complacency.
Any chance America has of moving forward after this terrible, infuriating year and Presidential term must come from all of us demanding a new start. A new start that must understand and come to terms with our very flawed past.
The support of women's equality on the basis of their sex-class isn't bigotry. Women have been discriminated against for all of history based upon it, why shouldn't there be true equality be based upon it as well?
Instead we get acquiescence demanded as kindness, biological reality equated with bigotry & critical thinking abandoned for subterfuge or outright rage. But the support of women's equality on the basis of their sex-class isn't bigotry.
The immutable claim that a yearning equals a completely different material reality regardless of & in spite of its detriment to women? That is bigotry. The command to cede not only space but essence is bigotry.
In just over a month, I've witnessed two distressing moments in Irish culture, the airing of The Hunger on @RTEOne & the release of the #motherandbabyhomes report. Two gross wounds; one inflicted, the other self inflicted.
Thread.
#TheHunger was harrowing; heartbreaking. I was incredibly moved by it, forced to imagine with much more clarity the struggle my Gr Gr Grandad went through as a child-what he must've seen, smelled, feared, felt. The sadness that must have permeated his life. It's near impossible
to reconcile the great imprint it's made on the story of every person on this island & on the story of those who had to leave. I feel slightly unique in being someone who, in a way, returned from that scar-an immigrant returned from an emigrant departed.
i've been so moved by the poetry i've read lately. this is a thread of the few poems that have come across my timeline so far. i'd love to read more. if you've seen any others, i'd love to read them.
While the historical disdain & hatred for women isn't a surprise, the severity of suffering & the unrevealed stories are frightening & devastating. I balk at what we don't know. This report covers 18/41 of these dark mills & only a fraction of the 231 years of their existence. 1/
I'm overwhelmed by the threads & accounts I've been reading over the last few days. I don't want to do it anymore, but at the same time I feel like we all need to bear witness to this atrocity. 2/
We rightly quiver at the though of the innocent babies. those pure beings so effectively eliminated in a fashion the worst of 20th century humanity could have provided; so callously offered up to strangers, given away by those who had no right to rend. 3/
Today is the international day for the elimination of violence against women. The violence, harassment & inequity perpetrated & fostered by men against women must stop & it‘s up to men to stop it.
An est 6% of males are rapists, that's approx. 234mil worldwide. This stat comes from two different studies cited below on the veracity of the Enliven Project re: the legal issues around rape, prosecutions & concerns about false accusations.
In the UK, the number of prosecutions & convictions for rape is down to the lowest level since annual recording began. In Ireland, 50% of women experience some form of sexual violence in their lifetime, compared to a fifth of men.
the facts of biological reality & sexual dimorphism aren't unkind. just as the support of women's equality on the basis of their sex-class isn't bigotry. who is acting the bigot here? those calling for reflection & discussion or those calling for the removal of democratic rights?
you slandered every person who's spoken up for all the women who feel like they are being erased & for children to be able to lead the healthiest lives possible, both physically & mentally. you've lied about your intentions & cowardly turned off replies. it's unconscionable.
critical thinking is needed for a functioning society. this is an extremely complex issue with so many variations & side roads. but to lay baseless accusations & defame anyone asking for deliberation shows how flimsy your stance is.