Profile picture
, 3 tweets, 1 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
Uh... DOJ has a dedicated paramilitary force that can and does refuse to identify itself to the press because it's covert? Maybe this is something I just didn't know. Or...
PS/ We're still trying to figure out all the places Erik Prince has his claws in government, so my antenna goes up when what seem to be contractors (a) won't properly identify themselves, (b) are associating themselves with the second-most corrupt man in the administration: Barr.
PS2/ I'm not saying this has to do with Prince—or that these guys are telling the truth re: their provenance—but if you've read The Intercept stories on Trump seeking a private army outside legal and administrative convention, you see this contractor-like stuff and get concerned.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Keep Current with Seth Abramson (@🏠)

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SethAbramson see all

Profile picture
Seth Abramson (@🏠)
@SethAbramson
{sigh}

Look—it is *possible* that the below is what happened. There are certainly accurate elements in this thread. But we *do not know* that an unthwarted FBI Counterintelligence Division report has been assembled or will ever be made available to the public in any permutation.
PS/ I just don't want people getting their hopes up—and candidly I don't find it responsible for wishful thinking to be presented as simple fact. As I said, there are *numerous accurate facts* in the narrative I just linked to. But as to where it's all heading? That's conjecture.
PS2/ Was there a counterintelligence investigation? Yes. Did Mueller know about it and contribute to it? Yes. Is it broader in scope than the criminal investigation? Yes. Does the Senate have access to the full sweep of it? Maybe—maybe not. Will it ever come out? Maybe—maybe not.
Read 3 tweets
Profile picture
Seth Abramson (@🏠)
@SethAbramson
There's no bigger gaslighting liar than @JonathanTurley—he simply *will not stop* inappropriately using the word "collusion" when he's referring *narrowly* to the prospect of a before-the-fact Trump-Russia conspiracy to hack the DNC. Evidence of collusion *generally* is *legion*.
1/ And of course even as to the narrow question of whether there's evidence of a before-the-fact Trump-Russia conspiracy to hack the DNC, Turley's as squirrelly as you could possibly be—focusing only on what evidence existed at certain points in time, not the evidence at present.
2/ We can't begin to appreciate how carefully Trump's defenders parse their words when they defend him and attack the Trump-Russia probe. Ask them to explain how Stone knew WikiLeaks was going to have election-changing material *two months before the DNC hack*, they're silent.
Read 10 tweets
Profile picture
Seth Abramson (@🏠)
@SethAbramson
PROOF OF CORRUPTION is now in its design and production phase. It's presently 543 pages; it'll end up around 550 pages. (That doesn't include the 300+ digital pages that will host the book's 4,700+ digital citations.) This is what it takes to tell the story of Trump's corruption.
PHOTOS/ There's also a *long* Epilogue—a full chapter on George Floyd and the 2020 election—and an Index, but here are book's 42 named chapters. The COVID-19 chapter is 50+ pages; the story of Trump's war crimes in Syria, 32; China and Iran scandals, 33. The scope is an epic one.
PS/ While the book focuses on COVID-19, the election, China, Middle East war crimes, and more, events in Ukraine form a narrative spine. But it's *not* the Ukraine scandal you know—even if you saw every bit of impeachment news. This is the *full* story of what Trump *really* did.
Read 3 tweets

Embed code for your website

×
Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!