@Scott12Colin It's not incorrect. Logic does not change.
No you haven't answered it. Your "logic" involves something he never says but you infer, and it involves him hinging two of his arguments on the most unlikely scenario possible.
No you haven't answered it. Your "logic" involves something he never says but you infer, and it involves him hinging two of his arguments on the most unlikely scenario possible.
@Scott12Colin The scenario where although there is a big risk he has been exposed to Covid and believes there is a distinct probability he has it. He then goes into isolation with his wife, a situation not associated with catching new things, and then by massive coincidence...
@Scott12Colin He manages, against the odds, to develop something that has the symptoms of Covid but is, in fact, not Covid. The most amazing coincidence in the wold that he left work thinking he had something and was about to come down with something with the same symptoms that wasn't it.
@Scott12Colin Something which he A-Fucking-mazingly has not just accounted for, it amounts to a huge chunk of his reasoning to drive to Durham.
That is something else.
That is something else.
@Scott12Colin "There is the possibility we could both get sick and there is also this 1/100000 chance which also featured largely in my thinking".
