And having more closely examined it recently, you considered he did do that.
"Repetitive."
"Unnecessary."
"Wasteful."
"Confusing."
One of his 2 arguments for leaving has a huge logic error repeated twice.
![Image](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EZrooXHXkAEi3fE.jpg)
"Unnecessary."
"Wasteful."
"Confusing."
You're now saying you agree with DAG but you could go to town on him.
"It looks as if it's been done by someone who doesn't realise they're still recovering from a serious illness. Any lawyer should be sacked."
I don't care if you think it looks rushed. You have demonstrated you have no idea what you're talking about.