Profile picture
, 10 tweets, 5 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
@Scott12Colin You said it would be common sense to have a skilled lawyer check/advise.
And having more closely examined it recently, you considered he did do that.

@Scott12Colin Just yesterday you were suggesting that they were putting arguments with the logical coherence of a 5 years old.
"Repetitive."

"Unnecessary."

"Wasteful."

"Confusing."
@Scott12Colin Today you said it had been carefully crafted to head off any line of attack.

One of his 2 arguments for leaving has a huge logic error repeated twice.

@Scott12Colin Before you went as far as to say the problem in testing was obvious to the media.

@Scott12Colin The fact it was a carefully worded witness statement was so obvious it was a punch in the face for DAG, who said it at the time that the statement was first broadcast. Image
@Scott12Colin Something you failed to notice in the last week despite having referred to the the text multiple times over this week.

@Scott12Colin And then today, almost two weeks afterwards and referring to the statement which you described as:
"Unnecessary."

"Wasteful."

"Confusing."

You're now saying you agree with DAG but you could go to town on him.
@Scott12Colin Which is incredible since a week afterwards you described it as:

"It looks as if it's been done by someone who doesn't realise they're still recovering from a serious illness. Any lawyer should be sacked."
@Scott12Colin In one day you've gone from someone who has referred to the text and not noticed to now claiming to be authority.

@Scott12Colin Everything you have said thus far proves you are no authority, and what you think does not carry any weight.

I don't care if you think it looks rushed. You have demonstrated you have no idea what you're talking about.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Keep Current with Steve Analyst

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EmporersNewC see all

Profile picture
Steve Analyst
@EmporersNewC
@Scott12Colin If you separate the first sentence there is a logical orphan for the first sentence and a single logic summation at the end.

Are we now saying Dominic Cummings argues like someone with a mental age of 5?
@Scott12Colin That his mind has not developed to create logical constructs and everything he says is just statements with no particular cohesion?

That he doesn't understand the correct use of summation?
@Scott12Colin Then he still doesn't say it, and if he did, the problem with his logic isn't what he doesn't say, it's what he does say.

Changing this would suggest he changes his logic by the conclusion. So he's all over the place if he meant that.
Read 4 tweets
Profile picture
Steve Analyst
@EmporersNewC
@Scott12Colin It's not incorrect. Logic does not change.

No you haven't answered it. Your "logic" involves something he never says but you infer, and it involves him hinging two of his arguments on the most unlikely scenario possible.
@Scott12Colin The scenario where although there is a big risk he has been exposed to Covid and believes there is a distinct probability he has it. He then goes into isolation with his wife, a situation not associated with catching new things, and then by massive coincidence...
@Scott12Colin He manages, against the odds, to develop something that has the symptoms of Covid but is, in fact, not Covid. The most amazing coincidence in the wold that he left work thinking he had something and was about to come down with something with the same symptoms that wasn't it.
Read 5 tweets
Profile picture
Steve Analyst
@EmporersNewC
@Scott12Colin So to prove that their default mode was to assume all three of them had got it, here he is talking about reducing the risk to others. This is very big in his reasoning. How does he reduce the risk to others of Coronavirus? Well we find out in the conclusion. Image
@Scott12Colin When he provides his solution it involves a solution where he claims neither his wife *or* son could infect anyone. This is very clearly an indication that their default mode was to assume all three of them had got it. He is asserting a solution to the risk that he first raised. Image
@Scott12Colin And the final piece of evidence that suggests that their default mode was to assume all three of them had it comes from Dominic Cummings himself who said:

"obviously our default mode was: assume that all three of us had got it"

Which is pretty conclusive, I think.
Read 3 tweets

Embed code for your website

×
Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!