Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Ahilan Arulanantham Profile picture
@ahilan_toolong
Jun 4, 2020 • 4 tweets • 1 min read • Read on X
⁦I still find euphemisms about the Floyd murder jarring. @nytimes⁩ in election article says “But Trump’s belligerent response to protests after the killing of George Floyd, a black man, while in the custody of white police officers in Minneapolis...” nytimes.com/2020/06/03/us/…
And I’m like “wait, someone killed him while in police custody? Who was it? And how did they do that with the police right there?”
And from the same article: “a highly unpopular appointee, Senator Kelly Loeffler, who has been snared in a personal financial scandal.” Makes me so mad at the scandal that snared her! Someone should hold those responsible. Who might they be?
I know people are upset about the Cotton editorial, but for me this type of subtle ideology written into purportedly objective reporting - which I see ALL the time - is cumulatively much worse.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Ahilan Arulanantham

Ahilan Arulanantham Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ahilan_toolong

Ahilan Arulanantham Profile picture
Jun 21
Predictably awful decision in Muñoz today. SCOTUS kills off all claims--that had been brought for years--by spouses separated through the visa denial process, saying the citizen spouses have no right to any explanation as to why their partners have been denied admission. 1/6
For background, check out my thread on this case before argument here . Reporters (and others outside immigration world), please don’t ignore these huge immigration cases coming at the end of the SCOTUS term amidst all of its other major decisions!! 2/6
Among other highlights: SCOTUS leans into racist, sexist, and other retrograde history to support its claim that there is no tradition of protecting spouses in immigration law. It cites Chinese Exclusion statutes, and even the Alien and Sedition Acts (though not by name)! 3/6
Read 6 tweets
Ahilan Arulanantham Profile picture
Oct 4, 2022
Must read!! Superb brief filed by @karahartlzer in CA9 anti-discrimination challenge to the criminal illegal reentry statute. Bottom line: there's no question it was enacted based on anti-Mexican racial animus. Sorry for long 🧵but there's A LOT here. 1/ bit.ly/3yexodc
Recall that 8 USC 1326 is the most prosecuted federal crime in the United States, FAR exceeding all others. bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pd…. My colleague @ingrideagly has written extensively on it, e.g. bit.ly/3RxVg2q. 2/
Recall also @klytlehernandez has uncovered the law's racist origins. TLDR: Eugenics was all the rage in the 1920’s, when Congressmen (yes, all men) testified that the law was needed to "protect American racial stock" from Mexican "mongrels," among other v racist args for it. 3/
Read 10 tweets
Ahilan Arulanantham Profile picture
Aug 17, 2021
I’ve been trying to stay away from Twitter to focus on my SCOTUS briefing in Fazaga scotusblog.com/case-files/cas…, but the last few days have made that impossible. I'll say more about that case later. But for now a few thoughts on recent events… 1/
1. The Biden Admin’s failure to bring those who supported the US Govt in Afghanistan to this country is NOT bc it lacks legal authority. The parole statute (8 USC 1182(d)(5)(A)) clearly gives POTUS power to “parole” literally anyone into US. @IRAP @marikoinNY @adambcox 2/
But the admin doesn’t want to bring them because ... security concerns. This is ironic. As @IRAP’s Becca Heller said, if the Govt trusted them to protect US troops in Afghanistan, then why not trust them to come to Guam? 3/ washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Read 11 tweets
Ahilan Arulanantham Profile picture
May 24, 2021
There’s a lot missing from this nytimes.com/2021/05/22/us/… story on the decision to redesignate Haiti for TPS. Here’s some more context: @esullivannyt @TPS_Alliance @ReichlinMelnick @newman_chris @GuerlineMJozef @ErikaAndiola @eeerox @ACLU @ACLU_SoCal @davidcolker 1/
It says Trump tried to kill TPS as part of a “hard-line” effort to curb immigration. That line gets an A+ for white-washing! @nytimes plz state the facts about the former admin's motivations. They matter! Esp bc the Biden admin continues to keep some Trump policies in place. 2/
What are the facts about the Trump-era TPS terminations? Trump said, in a mtng _about TPS holders_, that he didn't want “people from shithole countries coming here,” and instead wanted more people from “countries like Norway.”nytimes.com/2018/01/11/us/… 3/
Read 8 tweets
Ahilan Arulanantham Profile picture
Jan 27, 2021
Two impt points about today's TRO decision enjoining the moratorium. 1. It does NOT apply to the enforcement priorities; enjoins only "the 100-day pause on removals." DHS still must apply the new memo to detention, in court, etc. Keep pressing for compliance! #FreeThemAll 1/
2. The decision is plainly wrong. It holds DHS _must_ deport people ordered removed bc 1231a1A says "shall." But that is squarely contrary to J. Scalia's SCOTUS opinion in AADC, which reviews the history of deferred action and then holds ... @aclu @ACLUTx @ACLU_SoCal 2/
"the Executive has discretion to abandon the endeavor [of executing removal orders] ... for humanitarian reasons or simply for its own convenience." & quotes treatise: "To ameliorate a harsh and unjust outcome, the INS may ... decline to execute a final order of deportation." 3/
Read 4 tweets
Ahilan Arulanantham Profile picture
Jan 21, 2021
Some thoughts on new #ICE priorities and moratorium memo. 1. The memo creates an interim system starting by 2/1/21 and running abt 100 days while DHS does full review. So folks will have time to critique this from both sides. This is just the start of building a new system. 1/
2. It has a refreshingly straightforward rationale: can’t deport everyone, have acute shortage of border resources, and there's a pandemic! So DHS must narrow its focus and guide agency personnel accordingly. Hard to imagine a non-frivolous challenge to that in court. 2/
3. The categories of priority individuals are narrower than any implemented in the last 20 years: a) Terrsm /espionage/other nat sec cases, b) recent arrivals (post-11/1/20), and c) people incarcerated AND convicted of ag fels AND and deemed public safety threat. 3/
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(