It demonstrates the difference between knowing what type of procedures will apply (leading to Gov's claim that companies/brokers/hauliers/ports had plenty of time to prepare)
/1
The second point seems difficult to grasp for many officials. If you know what paperwork you need, where's the problem? Can't you just do what you do now for 3rd countries? It's just more of that.
Well not quite
/2
/3
Even if you make S&S+customs decs mandatory before boarding this will lead to queues on both sides. I would argue the French are better prepared for that/ have more space than we do.
/4
/5
What makes ro-ro ports different is
1) accompanied vs unaccompanied traffic
2) speed and time available for advanced procedures
/6
- Lack of physical space
- Uncertainty over permits
- Driver checks
- Significant increase in volume
It becomes extremely difficult to apply existing 3rd country procedures on that scale
/7
1) large operators
2) hauliers and agents more than companies
/8
/9
While FTAs are not usually used for that purpose, this one will - that is very clear when you look at the UK's draft.
/10
/11
/12
/13
Hope this will get the attention it deserves
/14
/end