at the top of the heap is Lt Kebba, who in 2008 "initially decided to dismiss witnesses' claims [that another officer kicked a suspect in the head for no reason] because an officer knows better whether he is in danger than even two civilian witnesses." seattlepi.com/news/article/V…
#2 is James Danielson who appears to work a desk job in the Office of Professional Accountability and makes ~40% of his $328,000 salary in overtime/bonuses. Idk about your place of work, but if HR is working that much overtime, something is fundamentally broken.
#4 is Thomas Yoon, who was a defendant in a 2017 lawsuit for personally deploying 9 blast balls into a crowd of protesters in Capitol Hill, injuring street medics. (sound familiar?) Yoon made nearly $312,000 in 2018. #seattleprotestleagle.com/decision/infdc…
#5 is James Arata, who in 2008 ANONYMOUSLY SENT A LETTER TO THE SPD WITH FALSE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST FELLOW OFFICERS WHO GOT HIM DISCIPLINED.
#6 is Chief Best (***boos from crowd, overripe tomato flies overhead***)
#7 is former Police Union president, Ron Smith, who resigned from his union post in 2016 over a facebook post where he said “The hatred of law enforcement by a minority movement is disgusting … #Weshallovercome”. Smith made $297,853.29 in 2018
#8 is Bryan Clenna, who got a soft profile in the New York Times in 2013 for advancing AI-assisted predictive policing in the department. PredPol is widely regarded as the gold standard for racially-biased technology.
it's not even worth going down the line anymore. Capt Greg Sackman made $273,479 in 2018; a few years earlier, Sackman brutally beat a man for questioning Sackman's motives to ticket his friend for littering, resulting in a $185,000 settlement.
note that the man Sackman curbstomped, award-winning artist Maikoiyo Alley-Barnes, *wasn't even the one who littered*. His only crime was existing on the streets of Seattle while black.
The narrative that police reformists like to push is that violent cops are primarily newbie recruits making blue collar wages, and are redeemable with better policies and more training, more empathy, more diversity.
In reality, police brutality is perpetrated by cops who are now making over double the average Seattle tech worker salary. Even the officer who pepper-sprayed a child at a protest makes roughly the same as a UW assistant professor.
Sackman and Arata both received promotions after the incidents documented above. Your taxpayer money doesn't just go into cops' bank accounts, it goes towards a system that is perfectly optimized to cover up, protect, and reward racism, brutality, and moral bankruptcy.
anyway, here's a piece from Alley-Barnes' 2010 installation, TO SERVE AND PROTECT, left with no comment other than the settlement he received didn't even cover his legal expenses.
In 2016, during a sweep of The Jungle, a social worker pleaded with the police officer in charge, Sgt. Heidi Tuttle, to bring in crisis workers.
Later that day, Tuttle shot and killled an unsheltered man suffering from mental illness, Michael Taylor, for wielding a dull, 4" kitchen knife in an altercation with another man.
Tuttle made $164,123 in 2018.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Signed up for one of the science Mastodon fiefdoms and there is nothing in the world you could pay me that would convince me to hitch my wagon to this freak train
Gonna send them Isadore Nabi's Google scholar page and see what happens 🤞
A mass exodus of scientists from Twitter to Mastodon would basically amount to the community giving up on social media as a vehicle for combating mis/disinformation and weaponized science
This plot from my 2020 @PLOSBiology paper showing how extremists can dominate online discussions about research papers? Only gonna get worse if we decide Mastodon is the promised land of self-segregated digital academia
Building a following on science Twitter takes years, and that's within an ecosystem that already had hundreds of millions of users when most of us joined. Mastodon has a tiny fraction of that, and its discovery features are hyperfocused on the server hosting your account
Six years ago, I began investigating how genetics research gets appropriated and integrated into white supremacist ideologies. (1/n)
As many of you know, the Buffalo shooter’s screed explicitly invoked genetics research papers, and the scientific community has loudly been grappling with the implications…What do we do about it? Who's to blame? What qualifies as “censorship?”
In light of these conversations, it’s clear to me that many scientists are completely oblivious to the ecosystem that fostered the shooter’s embrace of these research papers, so I hope to provide some foundational information to guide ongoing discussions.
Excited to share my latest preprint with @Kelley__Harris, where we take a deep dive into the bibliometrics and altmetrics of Richard Lewontin's "The Apportionment of Human Diversity" biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
We aim to tell the story of how, why, and when TAoHD became iconic, and discuss the implications for how human population genetics research is carried out and communicated in the current scientific and sociocultural ecosystem.
The citation trajectory of the paper looks....weird. It's roughly bimodal, with a weak pulse in the 70s-80s, followed by a 2nd surge starting in the early 90s and peaking in the mid-2010s. Only 15% of citations occurred in the first 30 years, and 85% in just the last 20.
Out now in @PLOSBiology, @Kelley__Harris and I try to unravel what altmetrics and the fire hose of social media data really tell us about the potential impacts of research papers. 1/n
First, some background. Academics are *obsessed* with impact. Our entire ecosystem—grants, tenure, publications, etc.—is built around generating new & striking knowledge, with an implicit goal of producing immediate economic, environmental, or cultural impacts. 2/n
Impact is remarkably difficult to measure, and even harder to predict. Remember 2017 Nobel winner Jeffrey Hall? He left academia a decade prior, in part because the impact of his work was not immediately appreciated by funders and publishers. 3/n