Primary question is what the quashment really means? Has #JusticeQaziFaezIsa now been irrevocably decoupled from his wife’s transactions? Because if his petition has succeeded that means the reference was either malafide or showed no nexus/wrongdoing. But then Paras 9 & 10 are 1/
potential Trojan Horses. Why can SJC come into play again? Surely this is a matter now that pertains only to the wife. Can something else be discovered, uncovered or concocted that the FBR takes back to the SC/SJC so that J. Isa can be pulled back in again. In which case 2/
the sword is still hanging. & what chance does FBR have 2 resist external pressures where even more apex institutions have historically found it irresistible? This appears potentially sinister. Jubilation may be premature/misplaced. Hope idea not 2 tire judge into submission 3/3
@threadreaderapp “unroll”
