Yes! For Medieval astrologers some signs were fortunate and some less so, some good in some context and some good in another
At times this could veer into the fatalistic, but their reasoning was quite interesting
Taurus, Leo, and Sagittarius were consistently fortunate signs
At times this could veer into the fatalistic, but their reasoning was quite interesting
Taurus, Leo, and Sagittarius were consistently fortunate signs
Aries was good for war, Libra for victory, Virgo for philosophy, Pisces for art
However you don’t have the same sign hate you see on social media today. People were more than any one sign, they were a chart
However you don’t have the same sign hate you see on social media today. People were more than any one sign, they were a chart
This understanding show us the complex but ordered cosmology of medieval Muslims, the relationship to fate, and their understanding of time itself.
Everything had it’s place (even war) and everything had a time.
Everything had it’s place (even war) and everything had a time.
I should also add, while we are talking the zodiac here, premodern astrologers put more emphasis on the action of the planets in the signs then the signs by themselves
Sun sign astrology is mostly a modern thing with its own historical context
Sun sign astrology is mostly a modern thing with its own historical context
