(1) Tablighi jamaat has been allowed to go below the public radar again instead of alerting to its modus operandi exposed during pandemic and keeping it on sight in critical public discourse. A few questions that remain unanswered:
(2) Can those who claim that Tablighi markaz going ahead in pandemic was not driven by Islam, state if that makes Tablighis un-Islamic or anti-Islamic?
(3) If markaz in pandemic was committing un-Islamic or anti-Islamic acts, do Tablighis merit punishment for such acts?
(4) Does committing un-Islamic anti-Islamic acts make Tablighis non-Muslim or they still remain "Muslims"? if they remain Muslims, why is referring to such un/anti-Islamic act committing as "Muslims" in context of what they did - "Islamophobia"?
(5) Markaz/"gathering" is a core, essential and inalienable part of Tablighi doctrine. Are those who say Tablighi markaz was just an "error"/"not supported in Islam" willing to declare Tablighi as "not-Muslims"?
(6) If no one is willing to declare Tablighis as "not-Muslims", why are Tablighis wrong in insisting on their right to markaz as inalienable part of their "Islamic" faith? Why non-muslims wd be wrong if they think Tablighis did what they did, from their "Islamic" faith?
(7) Can only Muslims criticize or judge an act by a Muslim or non-Muslims affected by such acts have the right to criticize or judge them too? If judging/criticism is "exclusive", is it reciprocal - that is Muslims cannot similarly judge/criticize non-Muslims either?
