2/ "We don’t know what the long-term consequences are going to be”
It is beyond reasonable doubt that #vaping will be far less risky than smoking. @RCPLondon estimates that the long-term risk is likely to be no more than 5% of the risk of smoking
3/ “Very easy to get nicotine for #vaping from the doctor”
Actually no. The process is
▪️Complex & time-consuming for GPs
▪️Delayed by @TGAgovau approval
▪️Importing by a 3rd party
▪️Import permit needed
▪️Much more costly
It will be easier to go next door and buy a cigarette!
4/ "It took 40 years before the risks of smoking were known"
If cigarettes were invented today, we would know immediately that they were deadly. There has been huge progress in medical and analytical science since then. We have detailed knowledge of the toxicology of vapour.
5/ "Potential for addictive nicotine to get tens of millions of people into its clutches"
Almost all people who #vape are former smokers already addicted to nicotine. Vaping nicotine is less addictive than smoking. Nicotine dependence from vaping is rare in young non-smokers.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵1/9
Everyone agrees young people should not #vape or smoke
However, the current fear and panic about youth vaping is not based on the evidence, according to our paper published today in @ijdrugpolicy
Co-author Prof Wayne Hall
🧵2/9
In adolescents who have never smoked most #vaping is occasional and short-term
Frequent vaping in this group is uncommon: 1-2% in most international surveys eg England ⤵️
🧵3/9
Rather than being a gateway into smoking, #vaping is diverting young people AWAY from smoking overall. Increased vaping is accompanied by an accelerated decline in youth smoking
Eg in the US ⤵️
🧵1/4
41 leading tobacco control and addiction experts from Australia and NZ have written an open letter to Health Minister @Mark_Butler_MP asking him to reconsider the proposal to further restrict access to nicotine #vaping colinmendelsohn.com.au/butler-4/
🧵2/4
Their concern is that
“this approach will have serious and harmful unintended consequences for public health, will slow the decline in smoking and will ultimately be unsuccessful”
🧵3/4
The experts say that "a well-designed adult consumer regulatory model is most likely to achieve the two goals we all seek, i.e., making vaping products available as a quitting aid for adults who smoke and minimising access by young people"
Gross misinformation from 2 anti-vaping activists. No pro-vaping expert consulted to challenge or correct
No response to my letter to editor to fix it, so here are my corrections
Pls share
Thread...
1/ 'Switching has not been shown to reduce proven health harms’
Response
NASEM 18-2: 'There is substantial evidence that completely switching from ... cigarettes to #ecigs results in reduced short-term adverse health outcomes in several organ systems' nap.edu/24952
-BT did not invent vaping
-Vapes are a direct competitor to cigarettes and are a huge disruptive threat to the industry
-BT is mostly focussed on #HTPs
-If BT switches from #cigs to #ecigs, that is good for public health. vaping is 95% safer
2. Popcorn lung has been long discredited
There has never been a single case of 'popcorn lung' from vaping or smoking, and diacetyl levels are hundreds of times higher in smoke than vapour
The addictiveness of nicotine depends on how it is delivered. Smoking is highly addictive due to rapid nicotine delivery and other chemicals in smoke. Vaping is significantly less addictive than smoking
3/ doctors should be focused on getting people off cigarettes and nicotine completely
Ideally yes. But many smokers can't quit nicotine and switching to a safer alternative is lifesaving. The focus of #THR is reducing disease, not ceasing nicotine