@SenDuckworth 1. With all due respect, I believe an investigation on whether the president was or wasn't briefed will not shed new light on this matter. Yes, it has to be established but there are more important questions.
@SenDuckworth 2. There is no doubt that there is an empowered group of manipulable but mentally disturbed individuals representing several nations under the far right control. They represent global and local interests and they support strong populist trends.
@SenDuckworth 3. We must assume that the attacks on those specific American troops were in the interest of not only the Russian government but also whoever trump represents.
@SenDuckworth 4. After all that has happened in international diplomacy, it is naive to invoke "national interests" to understand what happened. They are not national, none of them: it is a global cabal (or organization or whatever you want to call it).
@SenDuckworth 5. The question is: what purpose did the murder of American troops serve? We must assume that whoever trump represents in the US and the Russsian government work together - have always done so and will always do.
@SenDuckworth 6. What do they want with this? There is no such thing as a frivolous attack. Therefore, the big, the true question is: why and what interests do the murders serve.
@SenDuckworth 7. It is obvious that whatever the Russian government ordered was in coordination with their American counterparts. Now is the time to dig in and find out what give. Maybe a couple of PMCs that need to beef up the conflict... who knows?
@SenDuckworth 8. This is not the time to think "coutry". It is the time to thing "agenda" and "interest". Because for an operation like this, there is certainly a very interesting strategy story behind. Let's hear it.
@SenDuckworth @threadreaderapp unroll
