Under existing case law of the EU Court of Justice, employees can bargain collectively over salaries with no fear of competition law. According to the Court also the “false self-employed”, ie independent contractors who work in conditions similar to those of employees can do so👇🏼
The problem is that under this case law it is not always clear who is a “false self-employed”. This risks excluding many vulnerable workers from the scope of collective bargaining ‘cause they are nominally self-employed (think of platform or domestic workers, in some countries)👇🏼
In the past, Vice-President Vestager has opened to expand access to collective bargaining. However, she had only referred to those who are currently misclassifed as self-employers. This would perpetuate the problems existing with the CJEU jurisprudence about “false self-employed”
Today’s statements, instead, seem to move away from this approach and address explicitly the self-employed more at large, with no limitation only to case of misclassification. This would have momentous consequences 👇🏼
The Commission explicitly states that “Self-employed activities are very diverse, they can cover a wide range of activities and their situation varies during time.”This seems a recognition that some of them should be allowed to bargain collectively,regardless of misclassification
This change of approach might significantly expand the scope and extent of collective bargaining, potentially improving conditions of the most vulnerable workers in our labour markets. Among other things it would be more in line with ILO and Council of Europe’s instruments 👇🏼
It still needs to be seen how this will play out. A consultation has been open and there will most likely be harsh lobbying against including platform workers and other vulnerable people in collective bargaining as entire business models are based on undercutting their salaries👇🏼
Also, the consultation will delay the answer from the EU when the Covid19 crisis made it clear that the workers who would most benefit from this initiative bore most of the brunt of the emergency. This is also why the ETUC has expressed reservations etuc.org/en/pressreleas…
Anyway, the Commission seems to move in the right direction at least in admitting that current competition-law restrictions to collective bargaining are inadequate to deal with the huge heterogeneity of self-employed workers and something should be done about it👇🏼
For more info on how current EU competition law is at odds with the internationally recognized right to collective bargaining and how to reconcile it with that right, you may look at this paper written in 2019 with @UCLLaws’ @IoannisLianos and N Countouris papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) The Directive will force Member States to adopt a presumption of employment for platform workers. This is less stringent than the very strong presumption the EU Parliament wanted but much more meaningful than what Member States and the Commission initially proposed.
2) The national presumption will have to be based on “facts” instead of legal criteria as in the Commission’s and Council’s texts. This is a true procedural help for platform workers claiming reclassification. Also, the Directive expressly states that: (i) the this presumption…
Quando avete tempo, possiamo anche discutere del fatto che il Garante NON ha affatto bloccato ChatGPT, né ha mai deciso che in Italia vada bloccata l’intelligenza artificiale né sistemi di LLM come ChatGPT. Discutiamo da tre giorni di una allucinazione collettiva. THREAD 👇🏼
Il Garante ha notificato a ChatGPT che 1) non ha predisposto una informativa sulla privacy; 2) non ha chiarito a che titolo tratti i dati personali degli utenti che processa; 3) non prevede meccanismi per evitare che i minori di 13 anni accedano al servizio (la stessa OpenAI…
… si è preposta questi limiti di età). Tutti questi punti non sono una trovata goliardica del Garante ma sono chiaramente richiesti dal GDPR della UE. Il Garante NON ha bloccato ChatGPT. Open AI, la società che gestisce CHAT GPT ha settimane di tempo per spiegare come intende..
THREAD on AI, ChatGPT, and the Scientific Method. 1/ We've undergone the Scientific Revolution in a (problematic) attempt to understand the world and nature, including human nature, and then to dominate it through science and technology.
2/ The ultimate (again, problematic) goal of this endeavour was to gain control over these elements, to dominate them and bend them to our will. One of the fundamental aspects of the scientific method is the experiment, as it allows for replicability. #ScientificMethod
3/ Once you identify a principle, you can repeat the experiment with the same results and then apply those results on a large scale in the real world. What puzzles me about the current movement towards AI is that we want to create increasingly independent systems
+++CHATGPT IN A COURT DECISION +++
And so it begins! I am sharing here the first (as far as i know) judgement that openly used ChatGPT to ground its reasoning. It is in Spanish. THREAD diariojudicial.com/public/documen…
The crucial part starts on p. 5, where the Court reports the answers to the legal questions they posed to ChatGPT. Then, at the end of p. 6, the Court adopts the arguments given in these answers as grounds for its decision.
Apparently, the use of ICT in judicial decisions is allowed by the law in Colombia. The Court says: "The arguments for this decision will be determined in line with the use of artificial intelligence (AI). Accordingly, we entered parts of the legal questions posed...
NEW BOOK OUT! 🧵We are delighted that "A Research Agenda for the Gig Economy and Society" is out today. Ilda Durri, Charalampos Stylogiannis, @MathiasWouters1, and I edited it. It features chapters by a wonderful, interdisciplinary group of scholars THREAD e-elgar.com/shop/gbp/a-res…
As editors, we wrote the intro and first chapter of the book. This is the only chapter that discusses the employment status of platform workers across the globe in the book. All the other chapters concentrate on other, new and vital issues that affect these workers worldwide👇🏼
@AudeCefaliello and @CristinaInversi analyze the OSH risks suffered by platform workers and the challenges this work and other precarious forms of work present to regulators that aim at mitigating these risks. This is a hugely understudied and crucial topic👇🏼
+++BREAKING ON PLATFORM WORK AND VULNERABLE SELF-EMPLOYED WORK+++ The EU Commission just released its Guidelines exempting solo self-employed workers, including platform workers, from EU antitrust law for the purpose of collective bargaining - THREAD competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2…
The Guidelines cover ‘solo self-employed person’, i.e. persons who are not in an employment relationship and rely primarily on their own personal labour for the provision of the services concerned
This notion corresponds to the personal work approach to competition law and collective bargaining advanced by @N_Countouris, myself and other colleagues like @IoannisLianos (based on a longstanding idea of Mark Freedland and Nicola) HOWEVER… socialeurope.eu/collective-bar…