Feels like we need to go line-by-line on every tech piece these days to independently check facts.
Could do this in semi-decentralized way. For an article with 100 sentences, at $10/sentence, that's about $1k. At 4 tech articles per day, 365 days per year, "only" about $1M/year.
Could do this in semi-decentralized way. For an article with 100 sentences, at $10/sentence, that's about $1k. At 4 tech articles per day, 365 days per year, "only" about $1M/year.
You can learn a lot from the commentary in this thread. Feels like tech pieces would benefit from pre- or at least post-publication peer review by experts in the field, namely the investors and engineers and founders.
Here we go. Sheel may of course be wrong and I'd welcome a rebuttal, but this does look like a misleading stat was chosen to make a point.
Feels like many articles these days are prosecutor's briefs, without the defense.
Feels like many articles these days are prosecutor's briefs, without the defense.
