Profile picture
, 7 tweets, 2 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
💥 BREAKING: TRUMP LOSES SUPREME COURT BATTLE WITH NEW YORK PROSECUTOR OVER HIS TAXES AND FINANCIAL RECORDS
Vote is 7-2. Chief Justice Roberts writes.

Thomas and Alito dissent.
This means a grand jury investigating the president will gain access to 8 years of Trump's tax and financial records.

It does not mean the public will see them, for now.
This case is Trump v. Vance.

Stay tuned in 5 minutes for Trump v. Mazars, which involves congressional subpoenas and whether similar records may be made public.
Here is the decision. supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf…
Here is the first page of the historic ruling.

In short: presidents are not above the law.
Three references to (as yet unreleased) Trump v. Mazars in Trump v. Vance suggest the president may have lost there, too. Here is a quote from Justice Alito's dissent.

We'll see in a minute!
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Keep Current with Steven Mazie

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @stevenmazie see all

Profile picture
Steven Mazie
@stevenmazie
💥 BREAKING: SUPREME COURT SIDESTEPS TRUMP FINANCES CASE INVOLVING CONGRESSIONAL SUBPOENAS, RECORDS WILL REMAIN UNDER WRAPS UNTIL AFTER ELECTION
Case is Trump v. Mazars supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf…
Gist of the decision, which is 7-2 (with Alito and Thomas in dissent): lower courts did not take an adequate look at the special concerns involved when Congress subpoenas information about a president.

They need to try again.
Read 7 tweets
Profile picture
Steven Mazie
@stevenmazie
💥 BREAKING: CREEK LANDS IN OKLAHOMA REMAIN "INDIAN COUNTRY"

Justice Gorsuch writes for a 5-4 majority
The case is McGirt v. Oklahoma supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf…
Case involves the Major Crimes Act and asked whether Indians committing crimes on Creek land could be subject to state criminal law. Answer: no.

A major ruling upholding the status of Native American tribal lands.
Read 4 tweets
Profile picture
Steven Mazie
@stevenmazie
We'll know shortly after 10am whether the Supreme Court will allow Congress & a NY prosecutor to enforce subpoenas they've issued for years Donald Trump's tax and financial documents.

I've been thinking this morning about what Chief Justice Roberts is thinking about these cases.
Roberts is an institutionalist who cares deeply about how the Court is perceived by the public. He would not want to be seen as shielding Trump from scrutiny to bolster his faltering re-election prospects.

But he wouldn't want to be seen as interfering to hurt Trump, either.
Roberts is also (though not always!) a judicial minimalist. He prefers to turn big questions into small ones.

A minimalist ruling here would involve remanding the case(s) to the lower courts with a standard for what's an enforceable subpoena against a president.
Read 7 tweets

Embed code for your website

×
Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!