The concept of the carbon footprint is the invention of a communication campaign paid for by BP, one of the world's biggest oil producer. Its aim was to shift the responsibility for the climate crisis from fossil fuel companies to the individual. And it was successful.
Nevertheless, we use the term frequently in our communication, even though we are aware of the problems and contradictions. After all, the concept also has positive sides. It makes climate injustices and privileges visible, for example between countries and groups of the society.
Also, if we want to avoid climate breakdown, we need various approaches: systemic changes, changes in our behaviour and a change in our culture and how we deal with our natural bases of life.
Read more about this issue of responsibility this great article: "Who is really to blame for climate change?" bbc.com/future/articleโฆ
What do you think: is the concept 'carbon footprint' helpful or just a distraction?
Tell us in a comment!
โข โข โข
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#Aircraft #noise can lead to serious health problems, from heart disease to mental health issues, sleep disturbance and hearing damage.
E.g. estimates say night-time aircraft noise near Frankfurt airport leads to 23,400 hospitalisations and 3,400 deaths a year.
2/8
Air quality limits exist for particulate matter - but not for ultrafine particles (#UFP)!
As they are tiny, UFP penetrate deep into the lungs and bloodstream. This affects millions of people, not only those living around an #airport but also several kilometres downwind.
The aviation industry needs to face reality and find a #SafeLanding for the people working within it.ย
Various factors make change inevitable, but we have a choice: design or disaster. Let's choose design!
A thread about our #SafeLanding narrative and when and how to use itย โฌ๏ธ
Transformation can bring us a clean environment, a fair economy and livable future - and better, more secure jobs
To ensure this we need a #JustTransition that is targeted, led by working people, democratic, and part of a society-wide push to put us on track for a fair economy.
Messages to communicate the narrative:
โ Change will happen by disaster or by design, letโs choose design
โ Delaying change is reckless
โ Workers who built the aviation industry deserve a protected future
โ The first stage of transition is putting the brakes on expansion
โผ๏ธA class action lawsuit was filed last week in a Washington State court over health effects and soil contamination from air pollution from aircraft landing and taking off at SeaTac Airport.
The 46 page (double spaced) Complaint will be of interest to many in the US.
๐งต1/6
The potential plaintiff class is 300,000 home owners and renters within a 5-mile radius of the airport. The lead attorney is Steve Berman of Seattle, who some years ago won the first (and big) class action suit against the major tobacco companies.
2/6
Defendants: Port of Seattle (which operated the airport), Delta Airlines and Alaska Airlines (5th largest in US). The 2 airlines made 24% and 56% of the 287,114 flights into SeaTac in 2020. Albeit knowing about the health effects, the defendants grew facilities and flights.
3/6
1โฃ Private jets are the most polluting option. They emit huge amounts of climate-damaging emissions compared to already highly polluting commercial flights - and especially to low-emissions alternatives like trains. #BanPrivateJets#TaxFrequentFlyers#MakePollutersPay
2โฃ One flight on a private jet causes much more pollution than most people in the world produce in a whole year for meeting all their needs like housing, daily mobility and food. #BanPrivateJets#TaxFrequentFlyers#MakePollutersPay